On 4 January 2018 at 00:44, nick wrote: > > > On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote: >>> Why would dont add it at GNU G++? >> >> Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible? >> > > It depends actually, lambdas are consider the C++ standard of this. I am > wondering what > you mean Alexsandir and what is your use case as lambdas tryto solve this for > most use > cases of antonymous and nested functions. What are the requirements if any > that lambdas > don't meant and have you looked at the C++14/17 standard for them if your > compiler > supports it.
This is the gcc-help list, so compilers that don't support C++14 are off topic. > What do you mean by nested functions actually as that means a lot > of things in compiler or language development. This is the gcc-help list, so obviously it refers to the GCC extension: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
