By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken, they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a syntactic sugar syntax.
Austin On Jan 3, 2018 2:44 PM, "nick" <xerofo...@gmail.com> wrote: On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote: >> Why would dont add it at GNU G++? > > Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible? > It depends actually, lambdas are consider the C++ standard of this. I am wondering what you mean Alexsandir and what is your use case as lambdas tryto solve this for most use cases of antonymous and nested functions. What are the requirements if any that lambdas don't meant and have you looked at the C++14/17 standard for them if your compiler supports it. What do you mean by nested functions actually as that means a lot of things in compiler or language development. Cheers, Nick
