On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:27:31PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
> 1. Handling NOP_EXPR or CONVERT_EXPR that are in the IL because they
> are required for type correctness. We have two cases here:
>
> A) Mode is smaller than word_mode. This is usually from where the
> zero/sign extensions are showing up in
This is based on my earlier patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00452.html. Before I post
the new set of patches, I would like to make sure that I understood
review comments and my idea makes sense and acceptable. Please let me
know If I am missing anything or my assumptions are wr
On 19-May-14 01:02 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
Is it the case of code speculation where the negative latencies are used?
No. It is an exposed pipeline where instructions read registers during
the required cycle. So if one instruction produces its results in the
third pipeline stage and a seco
Hi,
should gcc warn at least if a dynamic_cast of a reference is used when
-fno-exceptions is specified?
At least 4.8.2 doesn't complain.
If so, I can implement the fix.
Example:
struct Base
{
virtual void f(){}
};
struct Der : Base {};
int main()
{
Der d;
Base& b = d;
dyna
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Gerald Pfeifer writes:
>> On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1?
>>
>> I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap,
>> FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486)
Hi,
Unfortunately I shall need to take this week off, due to university exams,
which are up-to 27th May. I will start working from 28th on pattern
matching with decision tree, and try to cover up for the first week. I
am extremely sorry about this.
I thought I would be able to do both during exa
Hi,
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> To me predicate (and capture without expression or predicate)
> differs from expression in that predicate is clearly a leaf of the
> expression tree while we have to recurse into expression operands.
>
> Now, if we want to support applying predica
On May 19, 2014, at 15:41 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
> For vxsim or smp, having entirely separate toolchains with different triplets
> for so minor differences seemed overkill and impractical for users, so we have
> added "-vxsim" and "-vxsmp" command line options to our toolchains to help.
>
> We
Hello,
Here is a quick description of changes we would like to contribute to the
VxWorks ports, with a preliminary query to maintainers on what would be the
most appropriate form for such changes to be deemed acceptable:
On a few CPU families, variants of the VxWorks OS are available.
Typically
On 05/19/2014 01:19 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 05:20 PM, Ian Bolton wrote:
On 05/16/2014 12:05 PM, Kugan wrote:
>
>
> On 16/05/14 20:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 16, 2014, at
Hello, Thomas!
On 16 May 19:30, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:47:58 +0400, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
> > we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
>
> As written in the README,
Hello Ian,
On 16 May 07:07, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> >
> > To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
> > we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
> > README with build instructions
> >
> > Please can you try that on trunk and report back.
>
> OK, this is trunk, and I'm not longer seeing that happen.
>
> However, I am seeing:
>
>0x007fb76dc82c <+160>: adrpx25, 0x7fb7c8
>0x007fb76dc830 <+164>: add x25, x25, #0x480
>0x007fb76dc834 <+168>: f
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 05:20 PM, Ian Bolton wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2014 12:05 PM, Kugan wrote:
On 16/05/14 20:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>> On May 16, 2014, at 3:23 AM, Kugan
>>> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know
On 05/16/2014 05:20 PM, Ian Bolton wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 12:05 PM, Kugan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/05/14 20:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 16, 2014, at 3:23 AM, Kugan
>> wrote:
>
> I would like to know if there is anyway we can use registers from
> particular regi
Is it the case of code speculation where the negative latencies are used?
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
-Original Message-
From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of shmeel
gutl
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Andrew Pinski
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Vladimir Makar
16 matches
Mail list logo
