Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-09 Thread Frank Nobis
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 12:25:33PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote: > [snipped some part] > >> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), > >> > > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> > > > >> > > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999 > >> > > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-08 Thread Seigo Tanimura
[snipped some part] >> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), >> > > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > > >> > > >> --- sbc.c.origMon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999 >> > > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999 >> > > >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ >> > > >> if (error) >> > > >> ret

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-08 Thread Charles Anderson
So then what is -1 and why does it work when -100 doesn't? (I tried it) -Charlie On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:13:41PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere? > > It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this. > A while back

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Mike Smith
> I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere? It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this. A while back I proposed something like: #define DEVICE_MATCH_EXACT -100 #define DEVICE_MATCH_CLASS -200 #define DEVICE_MATCH_GENERIC-300 The 'exact

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Charles Anderson
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere? Who calls it? -Charlie On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 19

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999 >> +++ sbc.cTue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999 >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ >> if (error) >> return error; >> else >> -return -100; >> +return -1; >>

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Thomas Schuerger
> > I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to > > work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked > > fine). > > > > Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people > > having problems with their AWE64? > > I had the same problem with my AWE64. An older kernel > @(

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Frank Nobis
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:43:55PM +0100, Thomas Schuerger wrote: > Hi! > > I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to > work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked > fine). > > Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people > having problems with their AWE64?

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Charles Anderson
I hate me too messages, but I'm having problems too. Exact same symptoms. I looked at sbc.c and it has the correct logical id, I spent some time looking at this last night, but was stymied by my lack of understanding of how the pnp system works. I even tried it with PNPBIOS defined, but that di

Re: AWE64 problems

1999-12-07 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
Actually, I'm having the same problem with my Soundblaster ViBRA16X. It seems that for some reason the sbc driver is not working right. = | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.| | Unix Systems Administrator