> I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
A while back I proposed something like:
#define DEVICE_MATCH_EXACT -100
#define DEVICE_MATCH_CLASS -200
#define DEVICE_MATCH_GENERIC -300
The 'exact' response is still < 0 so that you can tune between two
'exact' drivers on a per-instance basis. The meanings should be pretty
obvious...
> Who calls it?
>
> -Charlie
>
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
> > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
> > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
> > >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
> > >> if (error)
> > >> return error;
> > >> else
> > >> - return -100;
> > >> + return -1;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> static int
> >
> > Thomas> Works fine for me. Thanks!!!
> >
> >
> > Yes, this patch should work. The probe likelyhood(do we call it so?) for
> > unknown device is -100, so it does not make sense for sbc to return
> > -100.
> >
> > -1 might be too high, -50 sounds good to me.
> >
> > --
> > Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> --
> Charles Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> No quote, no nothin'
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
--
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith
\\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
