On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 12:25:33PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> [snipped some part]
> >> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
> >> > > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> > >
> >> > > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
> >> > > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:
[snipped some part]
>> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
>> > > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > >
>> > > >> --- sbc.c.origMon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
>> > > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
>> > > >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
>> > > >> if (error)
>> > > >> ret
So then what is -1 and why does it work when -100 doesn't? (I tried it)
-Charlie
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:13:41PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
>
> It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
> A while back
> I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
A while back I proposed something like:
#define DEVICE_MATCH_EXACT -100
#define DEVICE_MATCH_CLASS -200
#define DEVICE_MATCH_GENERIC-300
The 'exact
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
Who calls it?
-Charlie
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
> Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 19
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
>> +++ sbc.cTue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>> else
>> -return -100;
>> +return -1;
>>
> > I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
> > work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
> > fine).
> >
> > Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people
> > having problems with their AWE64?
>
> I had the same problem with my AWE64. An older kernel
> @(
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:43:55PM +0100, Thomas Schuerger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
> work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
> fine).
>
> Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people
> having problems with their AWE64?
I hate me too messages, but I'm having problems too. Exact same symptoms.
I looked at sbc.c and it has the correct logical id, I spent some time
looking at this last night, but was stymied by my lack of understanding
of how the pnp system works. I even tried it with PNPBIOS defined, but
that di
Actually, I'm having the same problem with my Soundblaster ViBRA16X. It
seems that for some reason the sbc driver is not working right.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator
Hi!
I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
fine). I have updated the world last week and am using
the kernel as of today. I'm using the "pcm0" and "sbc0"
devices in my kernel options. My card is recognized
correctly, but n
11 matches
Mail list logo
