On 2002-11-25 08:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
>
> But, i tried to install that package on my FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT, well it
> went fine, but when i try to run openoffice, i will get a "Segmentation
> fault".
> Hope you will have more luck.
As it says i
Hi.
Daniel Flickinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 25.11.2002, 07:09:09:
> package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
> snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
> OpenOffice.org...
>
> where does it reside?
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
But, i tried to install that pa
On 2002-11-25 06:09 +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
> package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
> snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
> OpenOffice.org...
>
> where does it reside?
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
>
> I would compile it, but I would need to reorga
Hi,
you can find it on http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/.
At Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:09:09 + (GMT),
Daniel Flickinger wrote:
>
> package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
> snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
> OpenOffice.org...
>
> where does it reside?
>
> I wo
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
> to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
>
> I did a search and tried some syntax like "0" for the irq etc. but no
> way to put something in polled
Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not
(for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just
going through and making everything unsigned is not the right
approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing some
of these fields once the tree opens back up, but
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Dan Lukes wrote:
> The problem you hit is that the pthread stub functions as declared
> within src/lib/libc/gen/_pthread_stubs.c are optimized-out by "-O3"
> causing undefined symbol errors later during build. I don't know if it
> is gcc's optimiser bug or there is somet
I do have one question re: UFS2, not specifically about this change
however..
I notice that the fields of the disk structure are signed.
Wouldn;t it make more sence at this early stage to declare them as
unsigned?
For example
take this snippet from struct fs
int64_t fs_size;
[ ... Objective C ... ]
Chad David wrote:
> And I thought this thread was dead :).
It just showed up in the inbox last night; it must have been stuck
in your mail server. Sorry about that.
> I don't really feel a need to "convince". If people are too busy (or
> just do not care) to maintain Ob
On Tuesday Nov 26th I plan to make an update to the UFS2
superblock. It will not affect UFS1 filesystems so should
be generally transparent to most -current users. For those
using UFS2 filesystems, the new kernel will update the
superblock to the new format the first time that your UFS2
filesystem
Hi, Poul-Henning
This is my DP2 box's info about 'GEOM' when power on with 'boot -v'.
GEOM: new disk da0
GEOM: new disk da1
GEOM: new disk da2
MBR Slice 1 on da0:
80 01 01 00 a5 fe ff 7b 3f 00 00 00 3d a8 da 00 |...{?...=...|
[0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):123/254/255 s:63 l:143
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:06:05PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Chad David wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Perhaps because maintaining them in the FreeBSD repo might be the wrong
> > > place. To answer your other questiion -- because a change to fix
Hi,
I can reproducable panic todays CURRENT by running ifconfig xl0 up
(My rl0 NIC works fine). The xl0 NIC works on STABLE.
Any help/ideas appreciated.
regards
tilman
polly# ifconfig xl0 up
panic: invalid ife->ifm_data (0x6000) in mii_phy_setmedia
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x
On 2002-11-24 23:33 +, Yann Berthier wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
> > I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
>Current) and installed that one with "pkg_add".
> > Ok, that
On Friday 22 November 2002 09.03, David Holm wrote:
> Hi,
> I've tried to build world since yesterday, doing cvsup's inbetween hopi=
ng
> for a fix. But it always fails on bin/cat with a bunch of unresolvable
> pthread symbols at linking. I have cleared out my old /usr/obj.
> cat cat.o
> /usr/o
Chad David wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Perhaps because maintaining them in the FreeBSD repo might be the wrong
> > place. To answer your other questiion -- because a change to fix one
> > thing for one person might break things for 10 others.
>
> Wh
Hi guys -
I accidently upgraded my workstation to -CURRENT over the weekend (forgot a
tag=RELENG_4 in my supfile and let it cook). It being a workstation and
containing no critical data, I decided to just stick with it and give it a go.
The machine's been running for a day and a bit now, and it
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:09:19PM -0500, John Von Essen wrote:
> Like I said, this is a fresh install with no config changes. Any ideas as
> to what is going on?
This is a known problem.
Kris
msg47387/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the "early
adopters guide" (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as
stable as possible to "getting a large number of users to test". But if
it's not recommented to use it in production environments, what test
results d
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
> I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
>Current) and installed that one with "pkg_add".
> Ok, that one went fine.
> But after that, i was not able to start OpenO
a wrote:
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with "pkg_add".
Ok, that one went fine.
But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault,
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
Current) and installed that one with "pkg_add".
Ok, that one went fine.
But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault, and
tha
Maybe I am missing something, but...
On my -CURRENT box (current as of last night). After a fresh install (no
tinkering with settings), when I use ssh to connect from a remote host, I
get the following error:
sshd[pid]: /var/log/lastlog: Permission denied
Also, the following processes are runn
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem
> is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which
> stems from the mbuf system eventually calling kmem_malloc(). This
> effectively prevents any network driv
Julian Elischer writes:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >
> > As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On
> > a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something
> > that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users ar
Sun Nov 24 13:00:02 PST 2002
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U sys/boot/efi/loader/main.c
U sys/conf/options.ia64
U sys/ia64/ia64/machdep.c
U sys/ia64/ia64/mca.c
U sys/ia64/include/cpu.h
cvs [update aborted]: cannot make directory include: File exists
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
Hello there,
As UFS2 is not backward compatible at all, I wonder why the old fstype in
disklabel is being kept:
#size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 102400004.2BSD 2048 16384 64008 # (Cyl.0 - 63*)
c: 186103260unused0 0
Hi!
I don't get very far when trying FreeBSD 5.0-DP2. Everything starts up OK
but when trying to write down my partition information the box freezes...
After awhile it reboots. The box is a Dual AMD 1400+ MP, with 512 DDR RAM,
IDE 40 GB (IBM). Tyan Tiger mothboard and a Intel 107100 NIC (fxp).
Fre
Hackers,
on yesterday's -current i see
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1354: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
this is IBM ThinkPad 390x laptop. dmesg and acpidump are attached.
any ideas?
thanks
max
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Pr
Hello,
I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
I did a search and tried some syntax like "0" for the irq etc. but no
way to put something in polled mode or to find an info on it.
It's a "lack" of device.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:06:52PM -0800, Terry Lambert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But who will bell the cat? I vote for Snuffles.
> >
> > Don't understand. Some inside joke or something based on US centric
> > TV? What are you trying to tell me? Remember I'm not native.
>
> 1930's/1940's
Hi,
Fairly new current system. Brand new KDE built from ports. Crashes
immediately I press the "k" start button.
Kcrash reports:
0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5
#0 0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5
#1 0x28ee1221 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from
/usr/lib
> I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
> required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about
> nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What
> libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this
> just paranoia inspire
Sun Nov 24 01:00:03 PST 2002
...
U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware/alpha/proc-alpha.sgml
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c
U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c
U sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
U sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c
U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c
U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbbreg.h
U sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c
c
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On
> a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something
> that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users are paying 20
> bytes/pkt for a feature they will n
Hi Folks,
I see this error while booting into BSD and I presume this might be the
problem that acpi on my TP does not work.
The errors are something like this.
acpi0: on motherboard
Using $PIR table, 14 entries at 0xc00fdeb0
ACPI-1354: *** Er
37 matches
Mail list logo
