OpenSSH 2.1

Okay, I've just committed OpenSSH 2.1 to -current. It was a difficult merge because the OpenSSH guys basically ripped apart the source code when they were rearranging it for SSH2 support, so I hope I put all of our local changes back in the right places. I've tested this as much as I could locally

cvsup6.freebsd.org

It seems to be responding very well to ping, but when I connect to this server with cvsup, it basically says "connecting to cvsup6.freebsd.org", and does nothing else. Is this server working? - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > > I see this money scheme as an extension of the "finger pointing" > > which does nothing to build team spirit. > > That depends very much on the way it's taken. At the moment, people > take the pointy hat voluntarily, not because it's forced on them. >

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Monday, 15 May 2000 at 13:48:19 +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > In some email I received from Greg Lehey, sie wrote: >> On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >>> On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >>> Maybe the comitters ought to take

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

Hi all, I think I might have an even better solution. Continue passing the pointy hat around & I'll buy the committer's keg at the next BSDcon. I for one appreciate the exceptional funcitionality of FreeBSD (especially the IPSec support). And also, if I buy the key, maybe I'll also be invited. R

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

In some email I received from Greg Lehey, sie wrote: > On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > >> > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > contribute $5 t

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >> > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it >

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) >>

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 11:06:50AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes: > : > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > : > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > : > all come due at the

Re: Proposed patch for PR misc/18466

:Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :> Index: anonFTP.c :> === :> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/sysinstall/anonFTP.c,v :> retrieving revision 1.29 :> diff -u -r1.29 anonFTP.c :> --- anonFTP.c2000/01/25 19:16:31

Re: Real Player not working

FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > branded as FreeBSD with old method and then it will always be treated > as FreeBSD binary. The effort to brand it as Linux with new method > will be ignored. > > Stripping Linux binary with Linux strip would be a workaround. Following Sean O'Connell's advice, I downloa

kern/18524 - SMP cpu stats

Can someone responsible for SMP please look at this PR: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=18524 This is necessary for tools like xosview, ktop etc to display per cpu stats. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of

Re: Make World kdump failure

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 05:02:48PM +, Andrew M. Miklic wrote: > I'm getting a "make world" failure with Alpha -current (cvsup'ed fresh > as of a few minutes ago, although this problem has persisted for over a > week, as far as I can tell)..it seems to be dying in kdump, strangely > apparently

Re: Warning on boot

"Andrew Tulloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Device char-major=116 minor=196608 opened in block mode, convert to char > mode with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 It has been fixed in sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1.255. cvsup or grab the patch and apply. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Steve Price wrote: > I too like this idea and along the lines of what Lyndon suggested > how about the attached patch instead? This is a better patch to the proposed functionality. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to > use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature. -d is a better place to put this than "-l", as this is a debugging feature. -- -- David

Re: Review and commit of bin/14911?

> "David" == David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> You might get more interest if you mention what the PR David> fixes. It adds missing binary/manpage links from opiekey to otp-md4 and otp-md5. Some of our remote users run software that semi-automates OTP logins, and that

Re: Review and commit of bin/14911?

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:14:19PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Could someone with commit privs please take a look at bin/14911? I'd You might get more interest if you mention what the PR fixes. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs

Re: Proposed patch for PR misc/18466

Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Index: anonFTP.c > === > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/sysinstall/anonFTP.c,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -u -r1.29 anonFTP.c > --- anonFTP.c 2000/01/25 19:16:31 1.29 > +++ ano

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

Chuck> Compatibility with those other makes is pretty low to begin Chuck> with, but it doesn't hurt, I guess, to allow for this. -dl Chuck> is ok with me. I just wouldn't consider the compatibility Chuck> thing a real issue if it weren't this easy to satisfy. It's not a big deal

Re: vn.ko load/unload/mount = panic

> In message , Nick Hibma wri > tes: > > > >Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you actually have to > >disassociate any dev_t's from the driver (by clearing the si_drv[12] > >fields) because we call destroy_dev and cdevsw_remove, so any

Re: vn.ko load/unload/mount = panic

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes: >> In message , Nick Hibma wri >> tes: >> > >> >Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you actually have to >> >disassociate any dev_t's from the driver (by clearing the si_drv[12] >> >field

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixedcommands in Makefiles

On Sun, 14 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for > > SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): > > > > -l load > >Specifi

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixedcommands in Makefiles

On Sun, 14 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: # Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1) # to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. [snip] I too like this idea and along the lines of what Lyndon suggested how about the attached patch inst

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for > SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): > > -l load >Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started >

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): -l load Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started if there are others jobs running and the load average

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixedcommands in Makefiles

On Sun, 14 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1) > to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. So I > went around and talked to a few people and one guy clued me in on how I > would add so

Review and commit of bin/14911?

Could someone with commit privs please take a look at bin/14911? I'd really appreciate it if that could get committed, and MFC'd into RELENG_4. Also, bin/6997 has been aging away for quite some time as well. Thanks, --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe free

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

It sounds like a useful feature to me. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send ma

make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

Hi all, Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1) to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. So I went around and talked to a few people and one guy clued me in on how I would add something like this (sorry, I don't remember the name ri

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:19:21AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > I'd go along with that. What do the other committers think? Can I drink pop instead? I'm underage, and I don't like alcohol anyway. :) -- Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N

Proposed patch for PR misc/18466

This is a general bounded-buffer patch for sysinstall plus it fixes PR misc/18466 (limited 'device name' size screws up FTP installs). It does not fix all the potential buffer overflows -- there are still a lot of strcpy's, but it gets half way there with the introduction and u

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes: : > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and : > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it : > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) : : I'd go along wit

Re: Linux emulation causes a halt

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 06:29:59PM +0200, Eric Jacoboni wrote: > > "Jesper" == Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jesper> Just upgraded my laptop from a late march -current to > Jesper> -current as of a couple of hours ago. > > Jesper> When it loads the "Linux binary

Re: Linux emulation causes a halt

> "Jesper" == Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jesper> Just upgraded my laptop from a late march -current to Jesper> -current as of a couple of hours ago. Jesper> When it loads the "Linux binary compatibility" it Jesper> shutdown, if apm is enabled it looks like wh

Linux emulation causes a halt

Hi, Just upgraded my laptop from a late march -current to -current as of a couple of hours ago. When it loads the "Linux binary compatibility" it shutdown, if apm is enabled it looks like when one do a 'shutdown -p now'. When I set linux_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf the machine boots properly, b

Make World kdump failure

I'm getting a "make world" failure with Alpha -current (cvsup'ed fresh as of a few minutes ago, although this problem has persisted for over a week, as far as I can tell)..it seems to be dying in kdump, strangely apparently on i386-specific stuff. Is anyone else seeing this? (Just in case people

Re: vn.ko load/unload/mount = panic

In message , Nick Hibma wri tes: > >Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you actually have to >disassociate any dev_t's from the driver (by clearing the si_drv[12] >fields) because we call destroy_dev and cdevsw_remove, so any later uses >

Warning on boot

Hi, I just up'd my sources to -current to try sblive support out. Did make world and new kernel but now I get a warning at boot. Device char-major=116 minor=196608 opened in block mode, convert to char mode with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 I'm sure it just a simple command to fix, but I don't

Re: vn.ko load/unload/mount = panic

Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you actually have to disassociate any dev_t's from the driver (by clearing the si_drv[12] fields) because we call destroy_dev and cdevsw_remove, so any later uses of dev_t's get an error because the device has gone away. Apart from that I don't think w

Re: Real Player not working

At Sat, 13 May 2000 15:45:02 -0500, emre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bash-2.03# rvplayer > ELF interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.1 not found > Abort trap This is the same problem as ports/18489, caused by binary branding confusion. $ file /usr/local/bin/rvplayer /usr/local/bin/rvplayer: ELF 32-bit