On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for
> SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris):
>
> -l load
> Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started
> if there are others jobs running and the load average
> is at least load (a floating-point number). With no
> argument, removes a previous load limit.
>
> Maybe this should instead be a -d sub-option?
>
> And I like the idea of adding the -l functionality described above.
Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to
use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature.
--
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
