On Sun, 14 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for
> > SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris):
> >
> > -l load
> > Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started
> > if there are others jobs running and the load average
> > is at least load (a floating-point number). With no
> > argument, removes a previous load limit.
Compatibility with those other makes is pretty low to begin with, but it
doesn't hurt, I guess, to allow for this. -dl is ok with me. I just
wouldn't consider the compatibility thing a real issue if it weren't this
easy to satisfy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | electronics, communications, and signal processing.
New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
