https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
Henning Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hmeyer.eu at gmail dot com
--- Commen
If there is only section zero that shouldn't count. Then we would
still try to work on an empty set of sections and give an obscure
error later.
* src/unstrip.c (copy_elided_sections): Check stripped_shnum <= 1.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
src/unstrip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insert
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRME
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-fedora-ppc64le while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/415
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: 6bb3ff44a4029562f45ddac354c670aa51ae7b87
Worker: fedora-ppc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> That gets the build a little further, but still stop the build, now with:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: ../libdw/libdw.so: undefined reference to symbol
> '__asan_unregister_g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> Sorry, I cannot replicate.
>
> Building with AddressSanitizer seems to not work.
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 83687 byte(s) leaked in 6977 allocation(s).
> make[2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
Bug ID: 33040
Summary: RFE: debuginfod could support other databaase backends
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Durigan Junior ---
I can't speak on their behalf, but I would guess that they already have an
existing PostgreSQL (e.g.) deployment that's well integrated into their
infrastructure, and they don't want to have to man
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33003
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> > Sorry, I cannot replicate.
> >
> > Building with AddressSanitizer seems to not work.
> > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33040
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler ---
> This wouldn't have happened if the service had been using their
> already-deployed pgsql instance.
I see what you mean - though whatever growing storage would have to have been
allocated at that dat
14 matches
Mail list logo