Looks like Tom's reply never made the dwarf mailinglist.
So here it is to make the archive on this issue complete.
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Michael> Issue 120628.1 mentions a need to distinguish between C++03 and other
> Michael> versions of C++. If you believe that
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:23:21AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Looks like Tom's reply never made the dwarf mailinglist.
> So here it is to make the archive on this issue complete.
>
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Michael> Issue 120628.1 mentions a need to distinguish
(Sorry top posting)
What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be helped by
this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords? (I can bring the
list, only "noexcept" comes from the top of my mind currently)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard
Sender: "Dwar
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 13:22 +, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be
> helped by this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords?
Yes, that is the intention. If there are different language variants
that have different keywords or w
On 11/26/14 02:23, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Looks like Tom's reply never made the dwarf mailinglist.
So here it is to make the archive on this issue complete.
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
Michael> Issue 120628.1 mentions a need to distinguish between C++03 and other
Michael>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 13:22 +, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>> What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be
>> helped by this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords?
>
> Yes, that is the intention. If there ar
