(Sorry top posting) What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be helped by this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords? (I can bring the list, only "noexcept" comes from the top of my mind currently) -----Original Message----- From: Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> Sender: "Dwarf-Discuss" <dwarf-discuss-boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org>Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:23:21 To: <dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] C++14 and C++03 (vs C++98)
Looks like Tom's reply never made the dwarf mailinglist. So here it is to make the archive on this issue complete. On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > Michael> Issue 120628.1 mentions a need to distinguish between C++03 and other > Michael> versions of C++. If you believe that DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 is not > Michael> necessary, I suggest that you discuss this with the submitter, Tom > Michael> Tromey, to understand why he believes that this is required. > > Mark & I discussed it and I couldn't remember any reason that this was > needed. > > Tom _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
