On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 13:22 +0000, Daniel Gutson wrote: >> What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be >> helped by this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords? > > Yes, that is the intention. If there are different language variants > that have different keywords or when certain DWARF constructs can be > interpreted differently depending on the version used in the source. For > C++11 there certainly is a usage. > > But C++03 does not change the language in any way from C++98 represented
Yes, IIRC it's a corrigendum actually. I got misled by the subject of the email :) sorry. > by DW_LANG_c_plus_plus. It really isn't a different language variant, > just some library extensions (and the library will be described by > existing DWARF constructs already). So the question is whether the > proposed DW_LANG_c_plus_plus_03 constant is actually needed, and if > adopted by DWARFv5, how a producer and consumer need to interpret it. > > Cheers, > > Mark -- Daniel F. Gutson Chief Engineering Officer, SPD San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5 Córdoba, Argentina Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211 Skype: dgutson LinkedIn: http://ar.linkedin.com/in/danielgutson _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
