Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Ian Romanick
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:23:40AM +, Michael wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:32:27PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > > I've updated the Mesa/demos/multiarb.c demo to exercise up to 8 texture > > units. It's nothing too fancy, but give it a try (grab it from Mesa CVS). > > Cool. Thanks, that

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michael wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:32:27PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > > I've updated the Mesa/demos/multiarb.c demo to exercise up to 8 texture > > units. It's nothing too fancy, but give it a try (grab it from Mesa CVS). > > Cool. Thanks, that works (and gives me something I know wo

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Michael
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:52:47PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:18:43AM +, Michael wrote: > > > Here's a first stab at the Radeon 3rd texture unit for testing, comments, > > flames etc. > > Congrats! Nice to see come cool stuff done. :) Thanks. > Shouldn't this

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Michael
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:32:27PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > I've updated the Mesa/demos/multiarb.c demo to exercise up to 8 texture > units. It's nothing too fancy, but give it a try (grab it from Mesa CVS). Cool. Thanks, that works (and gives me something I know works to add Fog specular and

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Romanick wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:18:43AM +, Michael wrote: > > > Here's a first stab at the Radeon 3rd texture unit for testing, comments, > > flames etc. > > Congrats! Nice to see come cool stuff done. :) > > > --- radeon_context.c 6 Nov 2001 16:47:17 - 1.6.6

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Brian Paul
Michael wrote: > > Here's a first stab at the Radeon 3rd texture unit for testing, comments, flames etc. > > I'm currently testing this and I'll probably make some of the 0,1,2's > into loops as I do that, but if anyone has a pile of 3 texture demos > they were itching to run... :o) > > I've no

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Ian Romanick
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:18:43AM +, Michael wrote: > Here's a first stab at the Radeon 3rd texture unit for testing, comments, > flames etc. Congrats! Nice to see come cool stuff done. :) > --- radeon_context.c 6 Nov 2001 16:47:17 - 1.6.6.4 > +++ radeon_context.c 13 Feb 2002

[PATCH] Radeon 3rd tex unit wasn't supposed to be Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Michael
...and I thought I was good at changing the subject... -- Michael. ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-12 Thread Michael
Here's a first stab at the Radeon 3rd texture unit for testing, comments, flames etc. I'm currently testing this and I'll probably make some of the 0,1,2's into loops as I do that, but if anyone has a pile of 3 texture demos they were itching to run... :o) I've not found much to test it with. I

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-02-03 Thread José Fonseca
Darryl, On 2002.03.02 01:05 Darryl Cording wrote: > > > Hi Jose, > >> >> ... >> > > I am using the source code and was wondering if I could simply unpack > the mach64 branch over the top of a X4.2 tree > and still get a working system after a compile. I tried it and it seemed > to compile O

Re: [Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-01-31 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.02.27 03:38 Darryl Cording wrote: > G'Day, > > I have been playing around with the mach64 driver and was wondering if > the driver will > work in an X4.2 tree? or are the differences between the versions to > great and will require > specific porting of the mach64 code?? > > regards

[Dri-devel] Query on mach64 driver

2002-01-31 Thread Darryl Cording
G'Day, I have been playing around with the mach64 driver and was wondering if the driver will work in an X4.2 tree? or are the differences between the versions to great and will require specific porting of the mach64 code?? regards Darryl ___ Dri