Slava Polyakov wrote:
>
> 2.4.19-pre10:
>
> version: 0.99
> bridge id: 0x11308086
> agp_mode: 0x1f000207
> aper_base: 0xd800
> aper_size: 64
> pg_total: 82176
> pg_system: 82176
> pg_used: 0
> entry.key : 0
> entry.key : 1
> Allocated 8 megs of GART memory
> MemoryBenchmark: 521 mb/s
> Memo
led X, so...
Will try 20020625 tonight.
Liam
it depends
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members!
JabConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.
> > That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
> > perfectly.
> I assume you're referring to Window here, right? I don't think the
> current cvs will enable DRI at this resolution yet.
Well, I run it with DRI/Linux+XFree4.2.0. My screen resolution is
1280x1024 16bpp:
If the critical feedback is already big now,
then first fix a bit in drivers
and then widen the testing audience.
> A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs). A bit I have to workc.
> A bit I had to drive my Toyota MR2 Roadster. A bit I had to live.
>
> ; )
>
> Feedback is starting to rise.
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2002, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
>
> > > 8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
> > That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
> > perfectly.
>
> I assume you're referring to Window here, right?
> Vid. mem Card type Max. 3D resolutions
> - ---
> 4 MB Any 800 x 600 @16bpp, 640 x 480 @24bpp
> 6 MB PCI 1024 x 768 @16bpp, 800 x 600 @24bpp
> 6 MB AGP 1152 x 864 @16bpp, 800 x 600 @24bpp
> 8 MB PCI
On 25 Jun 2002, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > 8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
> That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
> perfectly.
I assume you're referring to Window here, right? I don't think the
current cvs will enable DRI at this
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:34, José Fonseca wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
>
>> In http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ as mach64 branch, the
>> old radeon tcl branch, and soon the ra
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 19:28, Jens Owen wrote:
> Wow, looks like you've been busy. Let's see what kind of feedback you get.
A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs). A bit I have to workc.
A bit I had to drive my Toyota MR2 Roadster. A bit I had to live.
; )
Feedback is starting to rise. Sh
Here is a sort of simple shell script that I just thought of that might
make people's lives a little easier. Cut & paste this into a file
(maybe /usr/local/bin/dri_debug.sh) and then add this line to your
equivalent of /etc/rc.local:
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/dri_debug.sh
to have it run at boot time
> 8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
perfectly.
> Note that an 8MB PCI card could get 1280x1024@16, but there would only
> be ~191kB left over for textures, which isn't likely to be useable.
Well, but
> As I said before I still have to investigate. I can't give more answers
> until I actually do it. (PS: reboot my machine to windows is not
> something I do often or even like to do..)
Looking forward...
> No double buffering, i.e., you would see stuff getting drawed over the
> previous frame. I
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:48, John J. Tobin wrote:
>
> Is the Virge MX+ supported? This is the one that was commonly found in
> notebooks, as that is what I will be testing it out on.
>
Yep. That is the laptop on which I developed my driver on. so it will run
better on it than on everything els
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:34, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
> In http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ as mach64 branch, the
> old radeon tcl branch, and soon the radeon 8500 branch, or for any other branch (x86
>Linux only I'm afraid).
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:41:16PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
>
>> Strange... When the 3 * screen size is checked an error message is produced and DRI
>> is given as disabled in the X log.
>Sorry for misinformation. After detailed investigation, I found the
>complain. It just was not prefixe
Pay Your Bills and get Cash Back Too
Now is the time to refinance your home or get a second mortgage to
consolidate all of your high interest credit card debt.
Get all the Smart Cash you'll need!
Cash out your equity while rates are low! (UP TO 125%)
All USA Homeowners Easily Qualify!
Damage
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >> >Should this [3 * screen size] be in video memory or total AGP memory
> >> >would suffice?
> >> The 3 * screen size restrition refers always on the video memory.
> >And will it always be the same? 1280x1024/24bpp is ... a bit more than
> >my humble 8
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 19:53, Nicolas Aspert wrote:
> Slava Polyakov wrote:
> > I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed running it on
> > an i815B). Could you send me the tarball or give me a url to it?
>
> http://ltswww.epfl.ch/~aspert/patches/testgart.c
> or
> http://dri.sourc
> Strange... When the 3 * screen size is checked an error message is produced and DRI
> is given as disabled in the X log.
Sorry for misinformation. After detailed investigation, I found the
complain. It just was not prefixed with [drm]:))) So I need 13440K:(
> Even yesterday Leif and I brie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The numbers are after some iterations, when they are stable.
I think the answer is on your last sentence :)
On 22:52, lunedì 24 giugno 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 22:46, Willy Gardiol wrote:
> > I feel big differences between
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:29:40PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
>> Is there anything reported on /var/log/XFree86.0.log or
>> /var/log/messages?
>Nothing. In XFree86.0.log there is no word about DRI! I presume it is
>because of this 3*screen size restriction.
Strange... When the 3 * screen si
Slava Polyakov wrote:
>
> I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed running it on an
> i815B). Could you send me the tarball or give me a url to it?
>
>
http://ltswww.epfl.ch/~aspert/patches/testgart.c
or
http://dri.sourceforge.net/res/testgart.c
a+
--
Nicolas Aspert
Keith Whitwell writes:
> > > > Crystal space's walktest instantly dies with a
> > > >
> > > > walktest: t_imm_api.c:316: _tnl_end: Assertion `ctx->Driver.NeedFlush & 0x1'
>failed.
> > >
> > > I also see that.
> >
> > I've reported it to the Crystal Space mailing list but have yet
max wrote:
> On Thursday 20 June 2002 13:11, you wrote:
>
>
>>I think you should upload it... Other people may be able to help finish it
>>or track down bugs...
>>
>
> Ok. Just uploaded the latest and greatest version of my driver in CVS.
> The branch is named: s3virge-0-0-1-branch
>
> 1) Co
> Jun 23 20:55:45 trinity last message repeated 638 times
> Jun 23 20:56:46 trinity last message repeated 195 times
> Jun 23 20:57:49 trinity last message repeated 366 times
> Jun 23 20:58:50 trinity last message repeated 354 times
>
> But this doesn't seem to be generated when I do a glxgears,
> From: Malverian ... [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I'm having some pretty serious speed issues with my ATI
> Radeon 7500 64MB
> DDR. And my hopes are in you guys for helping me iron out the kinks.
>
> glxinfo says that direct rendering is enabled
> X startup has no warnings or errors
>
> I'm
Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One thing I noticed is that I did not have EnablePageFlip set to true
> > in my X config file. Setting this raised the fps to 660. Is there any
> > reason why this isn't the default?
>
> The
> Is there anything reported on /var/log/XFree86.0.log or
> /var/log/messages?
Nothing. In XFree86.0.log there is no word about DRI! I presume it is
because of this 3*screen size restriction.
> >Should this [3 * screen size] be in video memory or total AGP memory
> >would suffice?
> The 3 * scre
On June 25, 2002 10:43 am, Nicolas Aspert wrote:
> Hello
>
> There are some Intel815 AGP changes in 2.4.19-rc1, but I am not sure
> these are the problem.
> Can you try to run testgart to see if problems are really agp-related ?
>
> a+
I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed run
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
>On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
>> Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
>> bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
>
>It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
>bui
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
>> I just tried to run my X in 1280x1024/24bpp (before it was 16bpp) and
>> lost DRM! I got it back only in 800x600/24. Now when we have AGP
>> textures working - what are the restrictions on resolutions/color depth?
>Still no ans
> I just tried to run my X in 1280x1024/24bpp (before it was 16bpp) and
> lost DRM! I got it back only in 800x600/24. Now when we have AGP
> textures working - what are the restrictions on resolutions/color depth?
Still no answer..:(
Could please anyone tell me why I cannot get 1280x1024/24bpp wit
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 09:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Message: 11
> From: max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:22:01 +0200
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Dri-devel] S3 VIRGE DRI in CVS now
>
> On Thursday 20 June 2002 13:11, you wrot
Hello
There are some Intel815 AGP changes in 2.4.19-rc1, but I am not sure
these are the problem.
Can you try to run testgart to see if problems are really agp-related ?
a+
--
Nicolas Aspert Signal Processing Institute (ITS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)
--
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
>On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
>> Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
>> bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
>
>It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
>bui
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
> Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
> bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
building complex projects (like DRI).
Unluckily I still don't
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:53:53 +0200, max wrote:
> In drm_context.h at line 558 we have:
>
> queue = gamma_alloc(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
>
> I think it should be:
>
> queue = DRM(alloc)(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
>
> so that it works with driver different from gamma doing allo
Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
José Fonseca
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:20:36AM -0700, Max Lingua wrote:
>CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
>Module name: xc
>Repository:xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/li
On Thursday 20 June 2002 13:11, you wrote:
> I think you should upload it... Other people may be able to help finish it
> or track down bugs...
Ok. Just uploaded the latest and greatest version of my driver in CVS.
The branch is named: s3virge-0-0-1-branch
1) Could someone have a try and let m
In drm_context.h at line 558 we have:
queue = gamma_alloc(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
I think it should be:
queue = DRM(alloc)(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
so that it works with driver different from gamma doing alloc_queue.
Am I wrong? If not could someone fix that? Already done in m
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:36PM +0400, Konstantin Lepikhov wrote:
>Hi Jos?!
>
>Monday 24, at 10:16:51 PM you wrote:
>
>> As some of you already noticed, fixed binaries - i.e, including libdri.a
>> -, are now available on SF.
>>
>> When [and if] the binary compatability of libdri.a is restore
Hi Dri-devel!
Tuesday 25, at 12:16:57 AM you wrote:
> Hi Smitty!
>
> Monday 24, at 12:50:03 PM you wrote:
>
> > Well after beeing told to upgrade to XF4.2 from XF4.1 I did so:
> >
> > So XF4.2 Indirect rendering
> > install the latest / last binary package from TG
> > XF4.2 with direct render
Hi Jos?!
Monday 24, at 10:16:51 PM you wrote:
> As some of you already noticed, fixed binaries - i.e, including libdri.a
> -, are now available on SF.
>
> When [and if] the binary compatability of libdri.a is restored, let me
> know and I'll restore the things as they were.
>
> Jos? Fonseca
43 matches
Mail list logo
