On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 10:03, Daniel Polombo wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > My first guess would have been a wrong version of the kernel module, but
> > the one from the 2.4.14 kernel should work. Could there be a stray
> > libGL, e.g. in /usr/local, that gets picked up? You can check with ld
On Sat, 2001-11-10 at 20:58, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Note that it doesn't work correctly with all chipsets yet (the Rage M3
> loves to lockup) with XFree 4.1. I beleive the problem is specific to
> that chip and possibly not related to those AGP fixes as other r128
> cards seem to work pr
> The FireGL card is basically the same as the 7500/7800 with
> some modification
> to enable it to perform much faster then the 7500/7800.
As i wrote elsewhere, the 8xxx series is based all on similar chips.
(similar means that the hardware feature subset is compareable.)
Its the so calle Rade
I probably didn't explain myself well,
The FireGL card is basically the same as the 7500/7800 with some modification
to enable it to perform much faster then the 7500/7800.
So basically the FireGL driver can be with some very minor modifications work
with the 7500/7800 based cards.
Currently
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 18:05, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Around 10 o'clock on Nov 21, Michel D nzer wrote:
>
> > > In 1600x1200x24 It takes 1 full second to draw the screen, or a
> > > good 3/4 of a second. That is definitely not accelerated.
> > > Again, disabling DRI, the MMIO accel makes eve
[Personal reply with public CC.]
> Yeah, but would ATI release drivers for the 7500/7800/8500 or
> only to the 8500 series?
I dont know these specific models, not my personal scope.
But i would like them to be supported, so that anyone is happy.
> Any time frame? I'm going to order a machine
Around 10 o'clock on Nov 21, Michel D nzer wrote:
> > In 1600x1200x24 It takes 1 full second to draw the screen, or a
> > good 3/4 of a second. That is definitely not accelerated.
> > Again, disabling DRI, the MMIO accel makes everything fly.
>
> Color expansion is probably what's missing.
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 17:49 pm, you wrote:
> Hey, did these ATI FireGL products already hit the stores now?
> AFAIK they have not.
>
> As Linus always told: Things will come when they are done.
> Unlike Linus, the driver wont be open source, simply because
> of the high amount of trade sec
Hey, did these ATI FireGL products already hit the stores now?
AFAIK they have not.
As Linus always told: Things will come when they are done.
Unlike Linus, the driver wont be open source, simply because
of the high amount of trade secrets contained within. But
on the other side you will get prem
Hi all,
these cards have Linux32 driver (written at www.ati.com) and base AFAIK on
the Radeon 7500/8500 GPU.
So do these drivers give T&L Hardware support for OpenGL on new ATI cards?
I would like to buy a Radeon 7500 with DVI/TV/VGA out.
Anybody has these drivers?
Best Regards
Michael
_
I've just got a new Radeon 7500. I've tried to get it working under XFree86
4.1.
I get a problem "(EE) No devices detected." I assume this is because the 7500
is not supported as yet. I've downloaded and compiled the CSV tree and stil no
joy.
XFree reports "(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipse
I've just got a new Radeon 7500. I've tried to get it working under XFree86
4.1.
I get a problem "(EE) No devices detected." I assume this is because the 7500
is not supported as yet. I've downloaded and compiled the CSV tree and stil no
joy.
XFree reports "(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipse
On Tuesday 20 November 2001 11:27 pm, you wrote:
> Yep, that's correct. Had to deal with missing and/or conflicting info
> to boot...
This sounds strangely familiar... :-)
--
Frank Earl
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.
On 2001.11.21 07:27 Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dorin Lazar wrote:
>
> >> Sorry to bother you again. I talked with the people from ATI -
> they said
> >> that (and I quote)
> >>
> >> Hello Dorin.
> >>
> >> I noticed in your form you are doing work with Linux. We have
provided
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Ani Joshi wrote:
>> Well, I've now confirmed that we are not on crack. ;o) People
>> who claim they're using Radeon with DRI enabled and not having
>> any 2D slowdowns, are indeed on crack though, as the source code
>> itself, as well as developers have now confirmed to me
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 01:29, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> >It's a little suprising to me that removing some (fairly unimportant)
> >accelerations makes 2D "painfully slow"; except for a few things
> >like blits and solid area fills, acceleration just doesn't matt
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> konsole, mozilla, any other application that is maximized. You
> name it. I can watch it draw the whole screen and count out
> loud.
>
> In 1600x1200x24 It takes 1 full second to draw the screen, or a
> good 3/4 of a second. That is definitely no
17 matches
Mail list logo
