And I’ve now updated the wiki with all the new maintainers that got
nominated and accepted over the last couple of months.
Congratulations to all of them :)
Cheers,
Lars
On 08/12/14 09:22, "Paul Olav Tvete" wrote:
>On Friday 5. December 2014 10.56.48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Was there anyone
On Friday 5. December 2014 10.56.48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Was there anyone who did not get seconded?
No. You approved all of them. :)
- Paul
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developm
On Friday 05 December 2014 18:49:56 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Il 25/09/2014 12:17, Knoll Lars ha scritto:
> > There are currently a few empty spots in our maintainer list, and I’d like
> > to fill them again and make that list more complete before we have 5.4
> > out.
>
> I guess we should make t
Il 25/09/2014 12:17, Knoll Lars ha scritto:
There are currently a few empty spots in our maintainer list, and I’d like
to fill them again and make that list more complete before we have 5.4 out.
I guess we should make those nominations official now? :)
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@
+1 from my side. Both have been very active on the port, and we've seen
with Qt Network that a shared maintainership can work well.
Cheers,
Lars
On 16/10/14 13:44, "Vladimir Minenko" wrote:
>In addition to the below, I would suggest adding Rafael Roquetto as a
>second maintainer for the QNX pla
In addition to the below, I would suggest adding Rafael Roquetto as a
second maintainer for the QNX platform. Rafael was tightly involved in the
development of Qt5 for QNX and is working on several customer projects
using Qt on QNX.
—
Vladimir
On 26.09.14 14:04, "Vladimir Minenko" wrote:
>On 25
On Monday 29 September 2014 18:22:22 Jorgen Lind wrote:
> Giulio has driven much of the QtWayland development for 3/4 of a year now,
> and I think he is a good fit for as the maintainer.
>
> I can be the maintainer if he does not want it, as I intend to pick up
> QtWayland development again.
Giv
Hi,
On Friday 26 September 2014 18:01:55 Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Nichols Andy wrote:
> > My suggestions for replacement would be either Giulio Camuffo who as been
> > main driver for the QtWayland project this year, or Jorgen Lind who was the
> > previous QtWayla
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Nichols Andy wrote:
> My suggestions for replacement would be either Giulio Camuffo who as been
> main driver for the QtWayland project this year, or Jorgen Lind who was the
> previous QtWayland maintainer and who still has a deep interest in the
> project.
+1
Hi everyone,
> And you're right, the last time Andy reviewed anything in qtwayland was
> February/2014.
>
This sounds much more in line with reality.
> So, Andy, are you coming back? Or do you want to step down for someone else?
It is true that I have not had much time to devote to QtWayland
On Friday 26 September 2014 13:33:55 Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> Uhm, how did you get that number? A "git log -n 200 |grep Andy|wc -l"
> says 5 to me, four Reviewed-by and one Author, the last one being on
> February 11.
> I don't want to be dismissive of the work he has done on qtwayland,
> but he has
+laszlo.agocs=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Giulio
Camuffo [giuliocamu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:33 PM
To: Thiago Macieira
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Platform maintainers
2014-09-25 19
On 25.09.14 12:17, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>QNX is open for the moment, I’d love to hear proposals.
I propose Bernd Weimer for this role. Bernd has a long-term experience
working with Qt in general and was developing many core elements of the
current QPA for QNX. I know only very few other persons wh
On 26 Sep 2014, at 12:33, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> 2014-09-25 19:26 GMT+03:00 Thiago Macieira :
>> On Thursday 25 September 2014 10:17:25 Knoll Lars wrote:
>>> Windows: Friedemann
>>> WinRT: Andrew Knight
>>> OS X: Morten
>>> Linux (X11): Jørgen Lind
>>> Linux (Wayland): Already covered by Andy N
2014-09-25 19:26 GMT+03:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 10:17:25 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> Windows: Friedemann
>> WinRT: Andrew Knight
>> OS X: Morten
>> Linux (X11): Jørgen Lind
>> Linux (Wayland): Already covered by Andy Nichols
>> iOS: Tor Arne
>> Android: Bogdan
>> Windows CE: B
On Thursday 25 September 2014 10:17:25 Knoll Lars wrote:
> Windows: Friedemann
> WinRT: Andrew Knight
> OS X: Morten
> Linux (X11): Jørgen Lind
> Linux (Wayland): Already covered by Andy Nichols
> iOS: Tor Arne
> Android: Bogdan
> Windows CE: Björn Breitmeyer
>
> QNX is open for the moment, I’d lo
> To make it explicit, I’d like to propose the following people as
> Maintainers for different platforms:
>
> Android: Bogdan
+1
daniel
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi,
There are currently a few empty spots in our maintainer list, and I’d like
to fill them again and make that list more complete before we have 5.4 out.
To start with, I’d like to pick up a topic that had been discussed in the
past without reaching a conclusion. It is about having platform
main
Is it possible also to add sub categories under QtPorts for Windows/XCB/OS
X and etc in bug tracker?
Regards,
Liang
On 10 January 2014 23:51, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Yes, I was about to write a mail about it. We don't currently officially
> have maintainers for platforms, but they exist in reality,
Yes, I was about to write a mail about it. We don't currently officially
have maintainers for platforms, but they exist in reality, and I'd like to
make them explicit.
So if nobody disagrees, I'll add them to the list next week.
Cheers,
Lars
On 10/01/14 18:22, "David Faure" wrote:
>Could we a
Could we add a table at the bottom of http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers
with the platform maintainers, for each platform?
... unless I'm wrong and the concept doesn't exist within the Qt community,
but AFAIK it does?
I can't find who's the official maintainer for each platform.
--
David Fau
Il 23/02/2013 15:45, Giuseppe D'Angelo ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> in a few days I would like to stage
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/48657
> which will cause QOpenGLShaderProgram to ignore QT_OPENGL_ES (defined at
> build time) and rely on renderable type returned from the current
> contex
Hello,
in a few days I would like to stage
https://codereview.qt-project.org/48657
which will cause QOpenGLShaderProgram to ignore QT_OPENGL_ES (defined at
build time) and rely on renderable type returned from the current
context (via QOpenGLContext::format()).
This means that platform plu
23 matches
Mail list logo
