+1 from my side. Both have been very active on the port, and we've seen with Qt Network that a shared maintainership can work well.
Cheers, Lars On 16/10/14 13:44, "Vladimir Minenko" <[email protected]> wrote: >In addition to the below, I would suggest adding Rafael Roquetto as a >second maintainer for the QNX platform. Rafael was tightly involved in the >development of Qt5 for QNX and is working on several customer projects >using Qt on QNX. > >— >Vladimir > >On 26.09.14 14:04, "Vladimir Minenko" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 25.09.14 12:17, "Knoll Lars" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>QNX is open for the moment, I’d love to hear proposals. >> >>I propose Bernd Weimer for this role. Bernd has a long-term experience >>working with Qt in general and was developing many core elements of the >>current QPA for QNX. I know only very few other persons who know this >>code >>at a comparable level and/or worked on it that much. >> >>https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:bweimer,n,z >> >>— >>Vladimir >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Development mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
