Hi everybody,
After a lot of work and discussions, I believe we have now reached consensus on
a Code of Conduct for the Qt project. You can find the latest version on code
review at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243623/.
I do now consider this version as approved (it already has lots o
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:34:09AM +0200, Viktor Engelmann wrote:
> On 13.10.2017 15:33, Christian Kandeler wrote:
> >> Sure - but let's think about this in a different context: imagine
> >> someone applies at your company. You invite them to a job interview
> >> and have one of your engineers do a
oops - what I wanted to say about code of conduct: this is precisely why
I opposed a code of conduct in the QtCS discussion. A code of conduct
would pretty much lead to a situation where it doesn't matter if a
message is understood correctly - the one who wrote it is to blame by
default.
Some peop
On 13.10.2017 15:33, Christian Kandeler wrote:
>> Sure - but let's think about this in a different context: imagine
>> someone applies at your company. You invite them to a job interview and
>> have one of your engineers do a technical interview with them.
>>
>> Do you afterwards go to the applican
On Friday, June 22, 2012 08:47:34 am ext Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Alexis Menard said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing
> > lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular
> > contributor I feel sad about it. I feel sad to hear bashing
Hi d3fault
I think you should consider a bit more what you write - and your +1 to a
code of conduct is a bit provoking since you probably are one of the
persons that some people have in mind.
Maybe even I am on Qt-labs - though I mostly try just to seek knowledge -
and the last thing I want is to
evelopment-bounces+alex.bravo=nokia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+alex.bravo=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
ext Atlant Schmidt
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 5:01 AM
To: 'Alexis Menard'; Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin)
Cc: thiago.macie...@intel.com; development@qt-p
elopment@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Code of conduct.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, wrote:
> Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which triggered this
> thread now, i believe the community has behaved good lately. But i agree that
> a
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Alexis Menard
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, wrote:
> > Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which triggered
> this thread now, i believe the community has behaved good lately. But i
> agree that a general code of conduct for all our
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, wrote:
> Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which triggered this
> thread now, i believe the community has behaved good lately. But i agree that
> a general code of conduct for all our forums (mails, IRC, reviews,
> bugreports, etc)
I hate
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:30 PM, André Pönitz <
andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> I don't think the current level of what might be considered offensive
> wording in parts of the world is unbearable, and I don't really think
> spending time on finding consensus on such issues is sp
Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which triggered this
thread now, i believe the community has behaved good lately. But i agree that a
general code of conduct for all our forums (mails, IRC, reviews, bugreports,
etc)
So, let's grab one of the existing CoC for KDE, Linux.Co
Hi,
As others have pointed out, a "Code of Conduct" or just some general
netiquette guidelines [1] we can point people at may be a good thing. But it
doesn't end there. We can already reply to such posts saying "This is
unacceptable behaviour in this list". Equally as important, is to otherwise
av
.j.sm...@nokia.com
Ph: +61448283476
From: development-bounces+sarah.j.smith=nokia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+sarah.j.smith=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext
Thiago Macieira [thiago.macie...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 June 2012 9:14 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
On sexta-feira, 22 de junho de 2012 08.47.34, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Having a code of conduct may anyway be a good thing, but I
> don't think it would have made a difference to the behavior from
> non-contributors I think you're referring to in your mail.
> No matter what you do, jerks will be jer
Alexis Menard said:
> Hi,
>
> When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing
> lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular
> contributor I feel sad about it. I feel sad to hear bashing, complains
> in a way they should not be said, i.e. impolite, arrogant, ag
+1
I realise I am just an observer but even I do not want to observe these rants.
Cheers :)
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:41:50 Alexis Menard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing
> lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular
> contribut
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:41:50PM -0300, Alexis Menard wrote:
> We don't all like each others but that is fine. But we are not forced
> to accept people polluting the environment, the professionalism on the
> project especially when it starts hurting motivation of people
> *actually* contributing
x27;d certainly like to know what the current contributors think about this
proposal.
$0.02
Ben
> From: Kacper Gazda
>To: Turunen Tuukka
>Cc: "development@qt-project.org"
>Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 1:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [Development] Code of conduct.
>
&g
I only track Qt development, but could not agree more.
Qt community has to be strong for Qt not to lose its position.
Kacper Gazda
Software Engineer
Milo Solutions
http://milosolutions.com
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Turunen Tuukka
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> --
> Tuukka
>
>
> Alexis Menar
+1 from me.
--
Tuukka
Alexis Menard kirjoitti 21.6.2012 18:42:
Hi,
When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing
lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular
contributor I feel sad about it. I feel sad to hear bashing, complains
in a way they should not
Hi,
When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing
lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular
contributor I feel sad about it. I feel sad to hear bashing, complains
in a way they should not be said, i.e. impolite, arrogant, aggressive.
While I do understand
22 matches
Mail list logo
