Thanks and congrats for Qt 5.6 beta from my side too!
I had the same question has Helio did, about missing .tar.xz. Nothing
urgent, as long as they'll be available at least for the RC and final
releases.
-Timo
2015-12-18 17:32 GMT+02:00 Helio Chissini de Castro :
> Thanks for the work Jani
>
> W
Try two, thank you gmail.
2015-08-20 23:03 GMT+03:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
> Hi! yesterday I received a [bug] report asking Qt to not requiring apps using
> it to pass -fPIC (actually to let the app use -fPIE) due to hardening reasons.
We patched a couple of packages to use:
export DEB
2015-08-20 23:03 GMT+03:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
> Hi! yesterday I received a [bug] report asking Qt to not requiring apps using
> it to pass -fPIC (actually to let the app use -fPIE) due to hardening reasons.
We patched a couple of packages to use:
__
2015-01-20 19:59 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> scheme.) Debian is now using qtchooser. (But have they ever shipped a
> "qmake5" to begin with?)
The original packaging used the -qt5 suffix but it was dropped [1] in
favor of the recommended qtchooser before uploading the first Qt 5
version to Debian or
2014-11-24 19:10 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
> When did Debian remove Qt3?
It seems only in 2012... Maybe the pkg-kde's Qt4 -> Qt5 plan is too
optimistic, but the ease of porting might result in Debian archive
void of Qt4-only packages surprisingly soon. Most proprietary Qt
software tends to ship
2014-11-17 18:49 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
> By the way, I read somewhere that some distros are considering not shipping
> Qt 4 as early as their next releases. I also think that's shortsighted. Keep
> it in your repos all the way into 2017...
Debian plans to not have Qt 4 after Debian 8.0 [1].
2014-05-07 11:03 GMT+03:00 Heikkinen Jani :
> We have new Qt5.3 RC candidate packages available in
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.0-RC/2014-05-07_85/
>
> MSVC2012 package is missing but it will be available later today. Src
> packages are available as well at this time.
Ad
2013/2/15 Stephen Kelly :
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
>> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
>> for them at that time as part of the process.
&
2013/2/14 Jason McDonald :
> I've +2'd those changes, except qtactiveqt, which seems to need a copy
> of the LICENSE.FDL.
Thanks, and that qtactiveqt was also fixed.
>> The modules not part of official releases should also be updated at some
>> point.
>
> Do you have time to do that? If so, fee
2013/2/13 Дмитрий Волосных :
> It fails at this step:
You may be interested in seeing the build options used in the official
Ubuntu qtbase package build, which built DBus support successfully:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/131153286/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-amd64.qtbase-opensource-src_5.0.1%2Bdfsg
2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira :
>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
>> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
>> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
>> for distributing the modules.
...
> I think it's ok. L
Hi,
I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
for distributing the modules.
I started up with qtchooser [1] (merged) and submitted an
2012/12/14 Thiago Macieira :
> Binary renaming is not supported. If you rename binaries, then the qtchooser
> tool will not help you. You're entirely on your own if you do that and, mind
> you, the Qt documentation and all Qt support forums and channels will be
> giving the wrong advice.
>
> Theref
2012/12/13 Stephen Kelly :
>> I'd simply go for putting the binaries into a separate directory as
>> discussed. The only side effect is that developers using Qt 5.0 will need
>> to adjust their path to get qmake from Qt 5. Once the chooser is available
>> that problem will solve itself.
>
> And if
2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly :
> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper
o/
> and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a result of
> renaming the binaries and moving the mkspecs.
Thanks for notifying.
> So please, whether you use the wrapper tool or not,
15 matches
Mail list logo
