Hi,
I'd like to nominate Wladimir Leuschner for approver status for the Qt
project.
Wladimir created the (widget based) Windows 11 style and has been
driving the "fix frameless windows on Windows" effort. He also worked on
"custom title bars for Qt windows" together with Tor Arne recently.
Hey hey
On 15/03/2024 16:47, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 5 February 2024 01:44:29 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
I was trying to drop support for it in qtwebengine in 6.7, but the problem
was it was still used for qt packaging. But if we could at least switch
packing to vs2022, it would
Hey Nicolas,
On 15/05/2023 08:46, Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos via Development wrote:
Hi all,
I've created some patches for improving natvis support with Qt6
(debugging Qt with Visual Studio), but they are stuck waiting for
review for one month now:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-labs/vstoo
Hey Thiago,
On 17/01/2023 23:07, Thiago Macieira wrote:
The reason is that it is failing to parse a constant expression.
Generally I think that raising the minimal version could be done, but is
that reason alone good enough to warrant a minimal version raise for
every MSVC Qt user? How seve
Hey Thiago,
On 22/01/2023 17:15, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 14:07:42 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
The reason is that it is failing to parse a constant expression.
VS2019 is still supported by MSFT in "Mainstream" mode and will be for over
a year from today:
https://learn.
+1
Olli
On 20/12/2021 16:35, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
Hello all,
I’d like to nominate Morten Sørvig as maintainer of high-DPI in the Qt
Project [1].
Morten has been instrumental in the development of Qt’s high-DPI
support, and has been the de-factor maintainer for a while now. Let’s
make it
Hi all,
I would like to propose a change in Qt's Windows maintainership. I think
that everybody knows, that Friedemann has been doing a great job
maintaining the Windows platform specifics in Qt's code base. He wants
to focus on Qt for Python now so we have been looking for an alternative
way
On 22/05/2021 03:06, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote:
Hi,
As detailed in the other thread, I'd like to gather lazy consensus for
moving the official IRC presence from Freenode to Libera.Chat.
Please use this thread for voting ONLY. Apologies for all the formality,
but what I thought
Hi,
On 18/11/2020 21:36, Sérgio Martins wrote:
On 2020-11-18 07:34, Oliver Wolff wrote:
Hi
On 16/11/2020 23:29, Sérgio Martins via Development wrote:
On 2020-11-16 21:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2020 13:38:06 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
LLVM.org clang.exe binary reports
Hi
On 16/11/2020 23:29, Sérgio Martins via Development wrote:
On 2020-11-16 21:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2020 13:38:06 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
LLVM.org clang.exe binary reports the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc target,
which
is Clang/MSVC. clang-cl is just a different comman
Hi,
with Qt 6 approaching it is time to have a look at our set of supported
platforms.
One candidate for removal of support was our port for Microsoft's
Universal Windows Platform (UWP). Some considerations about dropping
this support have been communicated on Qt's development mailing list i
Hi Kevin,
On 16.06.2020 19:25, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Edward Welbourne wrote:
Kevin Kofler (16 June 2020 12:08)
What "shiny new features"? All that a real-world application such as
KWrite really needs from the operating system has been there at least
since the 1990s, possibly since the 1970s.
a
Hi Robert,
On 11.06.2020 15:02, coroberti . wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:43 PM Oliver Wolff wrote:
with Qt 6 approaching it is time to have a look at our set of supported
platforms.
The operating system was initially launched in 2009 and reached its
official end of life in January 2020
Hi,
with Qt 6 approaching it is time to have a look at our set of supported
platforms.
One candidate for removal of support was Windows 7. Some considerations
about dropping this support have been communicated on Qt's development
mailing list in March last year [1] and there were some discus
Hi
On 24.04.2020 08:57, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
On 4/23/20 15:52, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Proposed:
template using QVector = QList; // mark deprecated
template class QList { $(implementation to be
moved); }
Proposal 2:
template class QList { $(implementation to be moved);
Hi,
On 21/02/2020 13:57, Mitch Curtis wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eike Ziller
>> Sent: Friday, 21 February 2020 1:55 PM
>> To: Mitch Curtis
>> Cc: Ville Voutilainen ; Alex Blasche
>> ; development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] A modest proposal: disable lower-cas
Hi,
On 17/02/2020 10:13, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently have an "In Progress" state. In practice when I work on an
> issue, I initially do the work, then put that up for review; the review
> phase takes up fragments of my time for a while, unlike the main work
> phase, which
Hi Thiago,
I will have a look today.
Olli
On 16/02/2020 19:30, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-82166
>
> The bug report says:
> qmap.h(1213): error C2244: "QMultiMap::insert": Keine Übereinstimmung für
> Funktionsdefinition mit vorhandener Deklaration gefunden [..
+1
On 15/01/2020 15:27, Kai Köhne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Jörg Bornemann and Alexandru Croitor as joint official
> maintainers of the Build System in qtbase, which is officially unmaintained
> [1].
>
> Jörg has been doing a lot of work and reviews in qmake and the existing Qt 5
On 21/04/2019 10:43, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 18. April 2019 14:46:59 CEST Oliver Wolff wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning phase and
>> thus checking things that have to be done to make Qt even b
Hi,
as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning phase and
thus checking things that have to be done to make Qt even better.
Of course we also want to use this opportuniy to drop support for
platforms that are no longer relevant in Qt's new environment.
One of these platforms is
Hi,
as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning phase and
thus check things, that have to be done to make Qt even better.
Of course we also want to use this opportuniy to drop support for
platforms, that are no longer relevant in Qt's new environment.
One of these platforms is
On 07/02/2019 14:23, Yoann Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As most people have probably noticed, I haven’t been active on Qt
> Multimedia for quite some time now.
>
> Valentyn Doroshchuk should be the new maintainer, as he’s been the one
> putting most effort into the module for the past couple of yea
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksey
> Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich
>
>
> 15.01.2019, 09:55, "Oliver Wolff" :
>> Hi Aleksey,
>> On 14/01/2019 18:50, Aleksey Kontsevich wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Whether
Hi Aleksey,
On 14/01/2019 18:50, Aleksey Kontsevich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whether Qt Telemetry module will be included:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=playground%2Ftelemetry.git;a=summary
> ?
If I remember correctly, there was quite a large amount of comments
about the initial patch. As
Hi Harald,
On 13/11/2018 14:13, Harald Kjølberg wrote:
Hi,
Referring to: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70891
The suggestion is to remove Windows 7 as a supported development host, but keep
it as a target. From the numbers I have access to, more than 55% of the users
are on Windows 1
On 12/11/2018 23:03, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Montag, 12. November 2018 22:49:02 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Monday, 12 November 2018 12:38:38 PST Liang Qi wrote:
>>> * 10:53am staged 8 changes togehter -
>>> http://coin/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1543764990 (failed in 53m -
>>>
On 26/10/2018 09:18, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> On 10/26/18 9:05 AM, Oliver Wolff wrote:
>> +1 from here as well. I also think that the proposed document (and
>> especially the "enforcement" part) is way too long
> The KDE CoC [1] does not specify any action to be taken when
+1 from here as well. I also think that the proposed document (and
especially the "enforcement" part) is way too long
On 25/10/2018 19:39, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Volker Krause via Development wrote:
>> We do have a Code of Conduct at KDE for about 10 year
Hi Brett,
On 03/08/2018 14:46, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
On 8/3/18, 5:06 AM, "Development on behalf of Oliver Wolff"
wrote:
Hi,
Is everyone ok with this change? The ANGLE update from Google (which
uses a revision that still supports MSVC 2015) woul
Hi,
I would like to propose a change of where we get the ANGLE sources we
use in qtbase. At the moment we use Google's ANGLE
(https://github.com/google/angle). Unfortunately they stopped supporting
MSVC 2015 last year and their UWP code path does not build out of the
box. Microsoft (https://g
+1 (disclaimer: We are sitting in the same office)
Olli
On 25/07/2018 17:12, Alex Blasche wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate André for approver rights.
He has been with us at the TQtC for almost a year. He has mainly contributed to the
Win32 port (e.g. Windows UI Automation adoption & Windows
+1... he did a tremendous job with the AddIn (disclaimer: he is sitting
next to me in the office)
Olli
On 25/07/2018 17:12, Alex Blasche wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Miguel for approver rights.
He has been with us at the TQtC for a year. His largest contributions have been
to the Visual
On 27/06/2018 07:14, Oliver Wolff wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I merged a change, that enables execution of qtbase auto
tests on UWP (formerly known as WinRT).
The used configuration uses MSVC 2015 so error messages should be
somewhat familiar, but some UWP headers tend to give weird error
Hi,
yesterday I merged a change, that enables execution of qtbase auto tests
on UWP (formerly known as WinRT).
The used configuration uses MSVC 2015 so error messages should be
somewhat familiar, but some UWP headers tend to give weird error
messages. If you run into a problem you cannot fix
April 2018 14:18
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Proposing Oliver Wolff as platform maintainer for UWP
Hi,
As some might have recognized my focus inside the Qt Company has shifted
from WinRT/UWP towards our Automation related offering. While I still review
many patches for
+1 from me as well. He is one of the brave souls who had a look at
beautiful winrt code voluntarily (and gave valuable feedback on it)
On 25/04/2018 13:40, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to nominate Mårten Nordheim for Approver.
We've had him here at TQtC, in the Core & Network tea
Can someone elaborate on how "one package per OS" reduces the testing
burden significantly? We still have to check every
platform/configuration that is inside the package. All that changes is
that the testers install from one big package instead of smaller
packages. I doubt that one person will
Hi,
On 04/08/2016 09:49, Julius Bullinger wrote:
Hello,
because of QTBUG-52487, there's currently no straight-forward way to build an
OpenGL-dynamic QT 5.7 with MinGW on Windows. There's a patch attached to the
bug report, but it's not on Gerrit (and the author hasn't responded to the
reques
Am 23.02.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Graham Labdon:
Hi
So I just installed the latest visual studio addin (for VS2012) but I seem to
have lost the integrated help
Can anyone suggest why this might be?
thanks
Hi Graham,
what exactly does not work for you? Don't you have any Add-In or Qt help
avail
Hi,
the short and simple answer is no. The current version of the Qt Visual
Studio Add-In only supports Qt 5.x.
On 2/24/2015 15:42, Alessio Mochi wrote:
I would like know if exist an integration plugin for vs2013 that work
with qt 4.8.
Thanks.
__
Hi,
similar to the efforts that are done to get SSL running on Ios we are
also trying to make it happen on WinRT. Unfortunately the functionality
will not be ready in time for the feature freeze. As SSL support is
quite important for the whole network story (and to bring enginio to
winrt as we
On 13/05/2014 16:47, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em ter 13 maio 2014, às 09:57:59, Knoll Lars escreveu:
>>> That won't help unless we also disable the revdep for QtQuick, as QtQuick
>>> depends on QtNetwork.
>> That doesn’t mean we need to run the network tests as a revdep as well.
> Then the problem
On 06/05/2014 08:11, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Thanks Richard for taking the time to write up your summary, as the subject
> is pretty vast.
>
> On 05/03/2014 11:23 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
>> Support for QNAM
>>
>>
>> It's obvious that to be useful, a backend must allow QNAM to make
On 14/01/2014 08:26, Oliver Wolff wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to fix
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35632 and while
doing so I noticed that this use case is broken on Linux, Windows and
Mac. Running
the code from my last comment I get different results depending on the
platform
Hi,
I am trying to fix https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35632
and while
doing so I noticed that this use case is broken on Linux, Windows and
Mac. Running
the code from my last comment I get different results depending on the
platform. When
it is run on Linux or Windows I get:
E
Hi,
as some of you might have heard we are planning to get qtbase's winrt
branch integrated to dev in order to have a tech preview available at
least for that part of Qt. In order to have it reviewed properly it
would be awesome if some of you could have a look at the "winrt" topic
branch
(http
Am 30/08/2013 13:37, schrieb Robin Burchell:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to nominate aknight for approver status. Andrew has been
> doing some solid work that I've noted in QtWayland (and with wayland
> in general), and also appears to have some solid knowledge of Windows
> from his dashboard:
> https://
Hi,
just as a heads up we hope to be able to get at least the qtbase
part of Qt's winrt port into dev before feature freeze. Plan is to
create the merge request by September 6 so that there is enough time
for reviews. If you want to have a look earlier you are of course
welcome to do so as well. C
Hi,
Am 22/04/2013 03:14, schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> My server just let me know:
>
>>From git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase
> 60fbb00..c5a3cfa dev-> dev
> 1f3a67e..f78842a stable -> stable
> ! [rejected]winrt -> winrt (non-fast-forward)
>
> PLEASE let the mailing l
Hi,
Am 28.12.2011 22:25, schrieb ext Jeff Tranter:
> I am working on a project with Qt 5 where the Qt Simulator would be very
> useful. According to the Wiki document
> (http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/Qt_Simulator) there are five
> components that need to be built. Is anyone working on porting
51 matches
Mail list logo
