On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/12 4:45 PM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
>>> On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sunday, Jul
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
> On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> > We have only two choices:
>>> >
>>> > 1) make QWindowSystem
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 July 2012 18:50:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> So, either the code should stay as is - leaving the signals private and
>> making function pointer connects not work, or the patches should be
>> applied, making function poin
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 20:00:39 you wrote:
>> An alternate approach is to make a header specific to QTestLib which
>> ensures that modules privates are not required.
>
> This is very hacky. I prefer to simply move it from qp
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 16:54:57 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> &
eel free to include me in reviews in the future.
>
> cheers,
> Gunnar
>
> On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:58 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have a bunch of changes that make linuxfb compile, upto date with
>> latest qpa code and display windows on
Hi,
I have a bunch of changes that make linuxfb compile, upto date with
latest qpa code and display windows on the screen. You can see the
changes at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/t/32/.
Looks like all the QPA folks are on vacation :) I have managed to get
Samuel's +2 for a few changes and T
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> If it is not made public, then all CMake based code using QtTest will have
>> to use private QtGui headers.
>
> $ git grep -l QWindowSystemInterface | cat
> qtestkeyboar
Hi Laszlo,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> For those who were unable to attend, I have posted notes on
>> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Qt-in-Emb
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 18:21, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>> Any progress?)
>>
>> Konstantin
>
> Only another couple of days :-)
>
> You have been nominated on 7 of June, so you must wait for the 28 :)
>
The wait is over :) Can someone give him th
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 26 de junho de 2012 13.45.48, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> I haven't looked into renaming the libraries. Before I do that, I
>> wanted to check with the list on their thoughts/comments on this
&
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Looking at Qt 5 for packaging in Ubuntu.
>
> Qt 4 and 5 contain quite a lot of files with the same names, at the
> Ubuntu Developer Summit in April we discussed the issue of bin/moc
> qmake etc but I see all the libraries hav
Hi,
OpenGL session notes (pasted from
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/QtOpenGL)
so you can comment inline.
Thanks to Samuel for leading the session and taking the notes!
Girish
Future plans
- Desktop OpenGL 3+ support, ES 3 support
- QOpenGLWindow
- Shared cross pro
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
> For those who were unable to attend, I have posted notes on
> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Qt-in-Embedded.
>
> Let me know about comments
Whoops, sent too soon. Feel free to as
Hi,
For those who were unable to attend, I have posted notes on
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Qt-in-Embedded.
Let me know about comments
Girish
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-projec
Hi,
AFAICT, no changes are getting past the qtdeclarative CI. The last
integrated change was 5-6 days back. It's crashing on the Mac. It's
now crashed many times with the same backtrace (in
QQuickRenderThreadSingleContextWindowManager).
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28741
https://coder
s goes from 2814 milliseconds down to 1850 milliseconds.
>
> I would say that there is a big payout with changing what we currently have.
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Girish Ramakrishnan [mailto:gir...@forwardbias.in]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012
Hi QA team,
I think today is the second day, CI is getting stuck. I wish I could
just restart the integration. Usually, it's easy to let Rohan know if
we are somewhere in his timezone. But if we are not in his timezone,
it's quite frustrating.
There's also the case where it's a huge time save to a
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Keith Gardner
wrote:
> I was wondering if there would be a possibility of getting some of the
> conversion functions that are in QString implemented in QStringRef (toInt,
> toFloat, etc...). The reasoning behind this is that I am using the
> QXMLStreamReader
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> QTreeView is very slow when inserting big amount of data. In some cases, it
> is possible to achieve big speedup in case of wixed-height treeviews.
>
> I.e., in QTreeView calculating of item height is very slow. If we have fixed
> hei
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to nominate Ritt Konstantin for approver status. He's
> been contributing to Qt since a very long time, so I think this is a
> mere formality
> (http://blog.rburchell.com/2010/10/qt-contrib
Hi all,
I would like to nominate Ritt Konstantin for approver status. He's
been contributing to Qt since a very long time, so I think this is a
mere formality
(http://blog.rburchell.com/2010/10/qt-contribution-ecosystem.html).
His dashboard can be found at:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dash
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:42 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ?
>
>
No, it cannot be disabled. Qt will use either the system pcre or it's
own pcre. It's required by QRegularExpression.
Girish
__
Hi CI team/Gerrit team,
Pushes to gerrit are failing (qtbase).
girish@beast:~/Qt/qt5/qtbase$ git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master
Counting objects: 12, done.
Delta compression using up to 6 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done.
Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 1.08 KiB, done.
Total 7 (delta
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:52:30AM +0200, Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote:
>> On 5/29/12 8:22 AM, "ext Jørgen Lind" wrote:
>>
>> >Hi
>> >> 6. Rename the handle() to platformXXX() since it's easy to educate
>> >> that anything that has platfor
Hi Laszlo,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Laszlo Agocs wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> 2. qwindowsysteminterface_qpa.h. This is a little tricky. We have
>> qtestlib using it at this point because this is the way to send events
>> to Qt. The API looks OK, can we make this public?
>>
> QWindowSystemInterface
Hi,
Here's the current status of the proposed plan of action for QPA api.
1. We drop _qpa completely. So, it would become qplatformbackingstore.h
Status: Done
2. We teach syncqt that qplatform* is special and we move them all to
a special qpa/ directory. So, instead of #include
, it will be #incl
Hi Jorgen,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
>
>> I think that's a valid point :-) They are all inside qtbase because of
>> convenience. The build system wasn't and still isn't very friendly
>> when it comes to creating separate modules.
>
> I honestly dont understand this poin
Hi Jorgen/Laszlo,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:54:18PM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
>> > I think we should focus on keeping e
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
> I think we should focus on keeping eglfs as small as possible, but
> keeping the readability of the code, so that the entry level for "extending"
> eglfs will be low.
>
I think this is the first thing that needs to be discussed :-)
We h
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 23 May 2012 20:03, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Andreas Holzammer
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wanted to backport the sup
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Andreas Holzammer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to backport the support for Windows 8 to Qt 4.8, which is
> already done for Qt5 in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,22940
> With this change a symbol is added and therefore binary compatibility is
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:13:09PM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> 2. Rename our qt5 tool binaries - the binary names of moc, uic, qmake
>> conflict in qt3 and qt4. Now with qt5, we will have another conflict.
&g
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On sábado, 12 de maio de 2012 12.13.09, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> 5. QPA plugins + packaging: One can install the wayland and xcb plugin
>> simultaneously. We need a mechanism to switch the QPA plugin globally
>>
Hi Laszlo,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Laszlo Agocs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Because windowing systems will usually provide absolute coordinates in
> their pointer events, hiding all the cursor management, raw event
> translation, etc. hassle from the clients. Also the Qt events contain
> absolut
Hi Atlant,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Atlant Schmidt
wrote:
> Peter:
>
>> Then Qt Widgets is perfect for you: mature, stable API. You
>> only would have a problem when you have to implement features
>> which are much better supported by QML.
>
> Did I mention that we're also coded to depe
Hi Pier,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Pier Luigi wrote:
> 2012/5/16 Thiago Macieira :
>> [cross-posting to kde-multimedia]
>>
>> On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 18.55.52, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Why do we mantain an outdated fork of phonon in qt5.git
>>> I am talking about
Hi Thiago and Thiago,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Thiago Lacerda
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>
>> On terça-feira, 15 de maio de 2012 19.53.14, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> > Can we also have a sessions for Qt
Hi Quim,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Program
>
> We have a draft of the Qt Contributors Summit schedule structure,
> including a few pre-scheduled sessions:
>
> There is one plenary session each morning,
Hi Donald,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Donald Carr wrote:
> Guten tag,
>
> I am seeing poor performance of scenegraph on a:
>
> 0f:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT200GL [NVIDIA
> Quadro FX 3800] (rev a1)
>
> using the 302.07 driver (Upgraded from 295 in trouble shooting
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Carl Schumann wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 9:15 AM, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
>> On Monday 14 May 2012 09:11:20 Carl Schumann wrote:
>>> Qt developer community,
>>>
>>> I am a first timer at this process, but have now managed to get a change
>>> approved:
>>> https://coderev
Hi Guys,
Here's some comments that I collected from UDS last week. Quim,
Donald, Thiago and Adam might have more to add.
I have cc'ed Jonathan who was giving us a lot of the feedback, he
should be able to point us to the right people for further
collaboration.
1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - C
x27;qpa/qplatformnativeinterface.h': No
>> such file or directory
>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'D:\qpSOFT\DEVx86\bin\cl.EXE' : return code
>> '0x2'
>> Stop.
>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'D:\qpSOFT\DEVx86\bin\nmake.exe' : return code
>
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:21 AM, wrote:
> On 5/10/12 5:59 AM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
> wrote:
>
>>Hi Lars,
>>The current API appears to make modifications to values instead of the
>>document itself. This makes it quite cumbersome to modify a documen
Hi Lars,
The current API appears to make modifications to values instead of the
document itself. This makes it quite cumbersome to modify a document.
For example, to change the value of 5 to 10 in the json "[1, 2, [3, 4,
[5, 6]]]", one has to write the following code.
QJsonDocument doc = QJson
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 8, 2012, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
>> wrote:
>>> The change landed. For some reason, the ci is failing compile in
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Girish Ramakrishnan said:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
>> wrote:
>> > The change landed. For some reason, the ci is failing compile in all
>> > other modules
On Tuesday, May 8, 2012, Girish Ramakrishnan
forwardbias.in > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
> forwardbias.in >
wrote:
>> The change landed. For some reason, the ci is failing compile in all
>> other modules. Works locally with
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> The change landed. For some reason, the ci is failing compile in all
> other modules. Works locally with shadow builds but not on CI. I am on
> it.
>
Fix is integrating: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,2557
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
> wrote:
>> 2012/4/20 Stephen Kelly :
>>> On Friday, April 20, 2012 07:35:39 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Proposal sounds ok to
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 05:55 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2012 04:03 PM, ext Christoph Feck wrote:
>>>> On Friday 04 May 201
Hi,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 04:03 PM, ext Christoph Feck wrote:
>> On Friday 04 May 2012 13:37:04 Samuel Rødal wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> to be able to achieve smooth animations in QML 2, the animations
>>> should ideally use a fixed timestep, and not a
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Arun Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I created one web browser using Qt, Now I am in troble to download files
> from my browser , how I can call the default save file dialog and save to
> the dwnloaded file to disk when I click on the download link. Please help
> me...
>
Th
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> 2012/4/20 Stephen Kelly :
>> On Friday, April 20, 2012 07:35:39 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>>> Proposal sounds ok to me as well. If someone still has concerns, please
>>
>>> speak up.
>
Hi Lars,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, wrote:
> I'd like to aim for having the first beta (with a hard API freeze) our by
> the contributor summit. Depending on the feedback we will then add a
> second beta beginning of August and aim for a final release sometime mid
> to end of August.
>
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:16 AM, wrote:
>>From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [gir...@forwardbias.in]
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:50 PM
>>To: Donald Carr
>>Cc: Alpert Alan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); development@qt-project.org
>>Subject: Re: [Development] The p
Hi Donald,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Donald Carr wrote:
> Hey Girish,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>>>> And as others already pointed out, we need to be careful
Hi Shawn,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
>
> But can non-constant bindings be evaluated without v8 being involved? e.g.
> width: parent.width - 20
>
Yes, no v8 involved. I believe it's done our own js evaluator "v4"
(src/qml/qml/v4). See Chris Adams excellent new document
Hi Alan and Lars,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> And as others already pointed out, we need to be careful as to what we
>> expose in C++. Any API we add comes at a large cost (that you probably do
>> not see) in terms of maintenance and limitations to what we can change
>
2012/4/20 Stephen Kelly :
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 07:35:39 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> Proposal sounds ok to me as well. If someone still has concerns, please
>
>> speak up.
>
>
> I lost track of what the proposal currently is. Could it be restated?
1. We drop _qpa completely. So, it woul
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:25 PM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 19-4-2012 8:18, Robin Burchell schreef:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
>> wrote:
>>> As for a blog, why is there no qt-project blog? It would be great to
>>> have people blog
Hi Guys,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
>
> Since there's been no proposal, here's an alternate proposal:
> 1. We drop _qpa completely. So, it would become qplatformbackingstore.h
> 2. We teach syncqt that qplatform* is special and we move them
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a little worried that the position of QML in Qt5 is not entirely clear.
>> It's a great new
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little worried that the position of QML in Qt5 is not entirely clear.
> It's a great new technology, but that "new" part means that realistically it
> will not take over everything, everywhere, immediately upon the relea
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 18 April 2012 15:18, wrote:
>> Just for my mental state of mind: will these classes then be documented as
>> normal classes, or \internal, or do we need something special for them
>> still?
>
> I'd say we still want something special fo
Hi Shane,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
> Simple question, do we want the qt/ namespace to be for essentials only, or
> also for addons.
> e.g. should the path to an addon be:
> ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtftp
> or
> ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qtaddon/qtftp
>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:28 AM, wrote:
> Still the QPA headers are sort of a different beast from private headers.
> While I don't want to promise anything on them yet (I think we might want
> to keep SC and BC for them in patch level releases), they are supposed to
> be used by third parti
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:52 AM, wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the merge of api_changes back into master for qtbase finally made it's way
> through the CI system. I'm currently in the process of merging declarative
> back and Kent is staging all the changes required to fix compilation of
> the other
Hi Marius,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:03 AM, wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>>> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with
>>> a couple of helper scr
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a
>> couple of helper scripts
>
> I just added the following "-1&qu
Hi Robin,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
> wrote:
>> 1. qtestlib ends up exposing qpa api and thus testcases might end up
>> being binary incompatible - This should be fixed in
>
> AFAIK
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
> If you are a module maintainer, please check the patches below and
> provide comments.
>
> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a
> couple of helper scripts - one script ren
Hi,
If you are a module maintainer, please check the patches below and
provide comments.
As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a
couple of helper scripts - one script renamed the files and another
fixed the includes. Practically all the hardwork was done by my trusty
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am going through all the new apis. I have a couple of more changes
> to the public apis already. I am not submitting them to api_changes
> branch. I think Lars and co are having enough trouble as-is wi
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:21:00AM -0300, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 10.30.50, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:16:54PM -0300, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > > 2) ad
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
> On 4/13/12 7:18 PM, "ext Samuel Rødal" wrote:
>
>>On 04/13/2012 07:08 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am going through all the new apis. I have a couple of more changes
>>> to the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
> We would like to setup our existing project QtMediaHub under the
> qt-project.
I will take it that there are no objections :-) I will start the legal
process with Cristy and Marius.
Thank
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> I think the idea with _qpa_ in the file name is to imply that it has
> plugin api. As opposed to let's say qpen_p.h. This means that when I
> see a change to a _qpa.h file, I know that plugins will get affected
Hi Thiago,
2012/4/13 Thiago Macieira :
> On sexta-feira, 13 de abril de 2012 11.03.58, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi Thiago,
>> > Let's please not invent a new rule.
>> >
>> > If it's _p.h, it's private, otherwise it's public and subject
Hi Thiago,
2012/4/13 Thiago Macieira :
> On sexta-feira, 13 de abril de 2012 19.18.26, Samuel Rødal wrote:
>> On 04/13/2012 07:08 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I am going through all the new apis. I have a couple of more changes
>> >
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 07:08 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am going through all the new apis. I have a couple of more changes
>> to the public apis already. I am not submitting them to api_changes
>> bran
Hi,
I am going through all the new apis. I have a couple of more changes
to the public apis already. I am not submitting them to api_changes
branch. I think Lars and co are having enough trouble as-is with
getting api_changes to merge to master :-) All the commits will have
the "api:" prefix in the
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 11:37 AM, ext Hannu Lyytinen wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> after doing some small fixes to KMS QPA plugin, I proceeded with
>> implementing the input device support via evdev. It was soon pointed out
>> that perhaps using the generi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:57 AM, wrote:
> On 13/04/2012 08:50, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:56 AM, wrote:
>>> Starting from Thursday next week, we will copy the pages that
>>> currently live on wiki.qt-project.org over to qt-proj
Hi Alexandra,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:56 AM, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I assume everyone is aware of the current situation of us having two
> different wikis: one at wiki.qt-project.org and one at
> qt-project.org/wiki. It was never planned to happen that way, but
> sometimes plans don't really work
Hi Lars,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:49 AM, wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> hope many of you had the chance to take some time off over easter. I
> certainly did.
>
> Now that the alpha is out, there's work we need to do to get things in
> shape for a beta.
>
> We are now done with new feature developme
Hi,
We would like to setup our existing project QtMediaHub under the
qt-project. QtMediaHub is a media player pretty much like XBMC. It can
stream media to multiple devices, can be controlled using remote
control and completely skinnable (using QML).
The official home page is : http://qt-project.o
Hey BogDan,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:02 AM, BogDan wrote:
> IMHO these features are too important to miss the opportunity to include them
> in Qt5.0.
> Kindly please consider to include these features in final Qt5.0, I don't know
> if it will be a second chance to include them without any compro
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:50 AM, wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 09:38 AM, ext Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:54:56AM -0300, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 13.49.40, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
>>> wrote:
Those were local in Simo's mac
Hi haithem,
2012/4/4 haithem rahmani :
> Hi,
> I'm trying to cross-compile the QT5 alpha, for ST SoCs
> I configured it as follows:
>
> $> ./configure -opensource -confirm-license -no-eglfs -no-xcb -xplatform
> linux-sh4-g++ -prefix /home/rahmanih/qt-5.0.0 -no-opengl -no-xrender -no-xkb
> -no-xi
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jason H wrote:
> I was worried this would be a Duke Nukem Forever situation, I'm glad to see
> its not! :-)
>
> But last I checked there were many holes, like Windows desktop components,
> etc. It seems that Sybmian was very supported and the desktops were
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi QtWebKit team,
> is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the
Correction, I meant 'Since there is no QtWebKit 2.3 planned...'
Girish
___
Dev
Hi QtWebKit team,
What's the best way to deal with patches to QtWebKit1/qt4 (for
example, http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,21292) ?
Is the strategy still to get it all upstream? Since, I assume, there
is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the
answer that it won't ev
Hi Jordi,
Please push the change to gerrit and put me in as the reviewer.
Girish
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jordi Pujol wrote:
> Sorry, answer sent only to Carsten ( my mistake... )
>
>> Afaik you only have the option to remove the tab . I've implemented
>> that functionality, but right n
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Pierre Vorhagen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have had 2 issues with cross-compilation of Qt 5 to an ARM board, that
> I have not found clean solutions for.
>
> 1. For libbootstrap, qmake seems to pick up the cross-compiler, instead
> of the one of the developm
Hi Tuuka,
Following this up - did your release team members get access to branch and tag?
Thanks,
Girish
2012/3/16 Turunen Tuukka :
> Excellent, thank you very much for the trust.
>
>
> We naturally want to have all release content from the Qt Project. If some
> patch is needed, it is done via ge
Hi,
2012/3/19 hailong geng :
> Hi
> I remembered that Qt 5 alpha version would be released on March 20th?
> I am eager for that and just want to check it out whether this will come
> true ^_^
>
Unfortunately, no. The date has been moved to this friday or next
monday depending on when it's
Add ons.
Girish
2012/3/16 :
> Right, sorry for the confusion.
>
>
> Should I list Qt OpenGL under Essentials or Add-ons?
>
>
> Quim
>
>
> On 3/16/12 7:01 PM Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) wrote:
>
> Wohaa! I don't think i said to purge the QtOpenGL docs, those are still
> valid. It's only
Hi Tuuka,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>
> On 9.3.2012 17.41, "Girish Ramakrishnan" wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>2012/3/9 Salovaara Akseli :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are currently prepari
Hi,
2012/3/9 Salovaara Akseli :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are currently preparing & testing Qt 4.8.1 open source release for next
> week. Exact release date is still open, until all tests are passed. And, as
> discussed it is possible that critical problems are found, and then we need
> to take another try
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
