On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Richard Moore <r...@kde.org> wrote: > On 18 April 2012 15:18, <casper.vandonde...@nokia.com> wrote: >> Just for my mental state of mind: will these classes then be documented as >> normal classes, or \internal, or do we need something special for them >> still? > > I'd say we still want something special for them. We want these > classes to be documented somewhere (even if it's in a standalone set > of docs) and \internal would hide them. >
I already added \group qpa (for grouping) and \preliminary (for subject to change) for all QPA classes. I added \internal only because most of the stuff is undocumented :-) As we add documentation, we can start removing the \internal tags. Girish _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
