Hi Laszlo, On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan > <gir...@forwardbias.in> wrote: >> Hi, >> For those who were unable to attend, I have posted notes on >> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Qt-in-Embedded. > > Great! I have few comments from my side: > > 1) Please do not forget the QtSerialPort project we have been working > on. I see no mentionings about that. >
There was no representative from the serial port project in the discussion :) > I think serial port management is a crucial part of many existing > embedded boards and systems (just mentioning rpi via gadget serial > driver, beagleboard, pandaboard and so forth). Therefore, this should > also be a fundamental part of the vision. Luckily enough, we have a > good team around focusing on that, and can propose to a mature add-on > soon from playground. > Indeed. I think out-of-the-box working serial port management would be awesome. We should have pre-configured serial port settings for each device. > 2) Pandaboard (including the ES version) is not mentioned, but it has > been working fine for me as well. Our company has been using that > daily for business goals, so I would definitely put that there as > supported. I am sure, it is not just us. I would even say, it is > probably more appealing recently than the beagleboard. > Supported == whatever we have managed to get around working in mkspecs/devices. I actually have pandaboard spec here - https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,25365. I just haven't gotten around to polishing it. > 3) I find the onboard build important as well. Perhaps I can focus > more on that, if you do not find this ability that important as the > cross-build. This is pretty much the common way for ready-made OSes I > worked with, like ubuntu-arm, arch-arm and so forth. It fits better to > many people's workflow including me. > Yes, we could use with help here. Currently, we (as in Donald, Johannes and myself) have been only focusing on xcompilation support and not on-board compilation support. -device currently assumes xcompilation. It would be great to have it also support on-host compilation out of the box. Thanks, Girish _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
