Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

> Well https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html says > Original BSD license (#OriginalBSD) > This license is also sometimes called the “4-clause BSD license”. > > This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license with a serious > flaw: the “obnoxious BSD advertising clause”. Th

Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available

On 27 February 2015 at 21:04, Kojo Tero wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Sze Howe Koh [mailto:szehowe@gmail.com] >> Sent: 27. helmikuuta 2015 14:12 >> To: Kojo Tero >> Cc: Qt Project; development@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available >> >> On 26 Fe

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

On Friday 27 February 2015 20:29:36 Gunnar Roth wrote: > >> No need to mention > >> in documentation, end-user license, to provide source code etc. that LGPL > >> requires > > > > Because it's not LGPL requirement. > > > > > > What is NOT lpgl requirement? "No need to mention in documentation,

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

Hi Tuuka > There is no requirement to mention use of Qt if you have a commercial > license. Of course you do need to mention 3rd party open-source components, > to the extent you use them. Documentation contains a listing of these per > module to make it easier. > Okay there is http://doc.qt

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

Hi Thiago > >> the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells >> commercial customers. they they if you use modules which are under >> commrcial license as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about >> anything used in there. > > There's a page in the Qt documentation t

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

Hi Gunnar, There is no requirement to mention use of Qt if you have a commercial license. Of course you do need to mention 3rd party open-source components, to the extent you use them. Documentation contains a listing of these per module to make it easier. There is some 3rd party code that is

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

On Friday 27 February 2015 19:40:51 Gunnar Roth wrote: > Hi Thiago, > should i just take your word or do you also have a link for this? https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause-UC ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change > the requirement to document this is also more than qt

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

Hi Thiago, should i just take your word or do you also have a link for this? the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells commercial customers. they they if you use modules which are under commrcial license as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about anything used in

Re: [Development] Qt nameserver change

On Friday 27 February 2015 16:56:34 Hirvonen Olli wrote: > Tony promised to check during the weekend if something fails. He will > disable test that causes problem and proper fix is done next week. > > If someone (Thiago) for example knows what test to disable, please do so. > Alpha builds are re-

Re: [Development] Qt nameserver change

Related to this, we believe that everything is now transferred to new locations from the servers that are shutting down at the end of this month. DevNet (old wiki and forums) and mailing lists will continue to run in their old location one more month to allow adequate time for content migration

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

On Friday 27 February 2015 08:40:21 Gunnar Roth wrote: > is the so called adevrtising clause which is know to not be kompatible with > GPL or LPGL, so how can it be that i find this kind of license in qt source > code? What are the obligations to follow when using commercial license? The Universit

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

On Friday 27 February 2015 11:15:03 Al-Khanji Louai wrote: > In that case they cannot be overwritten without a recompile. Which brings me > back to my original comment from yesterday (to which no one replied): > > How is that different from linking a custom implementation of operator > new/operato

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

On Friday 27 February 2015 09:20:54 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > the whole point would be *not* using unwrapped malloc and new(nothrow). > this can be trivially verified for our own code with a grepping bot. There's an easier solution. See the reply to Louai. > > > then explain edd2d9bd0a7f5dbe05

Re: [Development] Qt nameserver change

Tony promised to check during the weekend if something fails. He will disable test that causes problem and proper fix is done next week. If someone (Thiago) for example knows what test to disable, please do so. Alpha builds are re-started after that. Inform Tony. A bit of defending: Even this m

Re: [Development] Qt nameserver change

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:57:41PM +, Järvenpää Petri wrote: > Qt nameservers have been changed to new DNS hosting provider. All > possible records have been created as they have been before, but some > non-standard records are missing from the new servers (e.g. PTR-type > record > ptr-single.t

[Development] [Announce] Qt Security Advisory: DoS vulnerability in the BMP image handler

Qt Project Security Advisory Title:DoS vulnerability in the BMP image handler Risk Rating: Low CVE: CVE-2015-0295 Platforms:All Modules: QtBase Versions: All versions before 5.5 Author: Richard J. Moore Date: 22 February 20

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

Sure, here's what I know: Regarding operator new: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/new/operator_new C++11 cleans up the exception specifications and specifies that the no-throw single object variant is called by the standard implementations of all other versions. Regarding operator del

[Development] Qt nameserver change

Hello, Qt nameservers have been changed to new DNS hosting provider. All possible records have been created as they have been before, but some non-standard records are missing from the new servers (e.g. PTR-type record ptr-single.test.qt-project.org). Thi

[Development] OSX 10.7 dropped from Qt?

Almost all 10.7 targets were dropped from the CI. Only some very obscure feature branches didn't get this treatment. Well, it turns out that one of my feature branches still runs 10.7 as a target and qtbase/dev doesn't compile anymore on 10.7: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/107381/ The

Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available

> -Original Message- > From: Sze Howe Koh [mailto:szehowe@gmail.com] > Sent: 27. helmikuuta 2015 14:12 > To: Kojo Tero > Cc: Qt Project; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available > > On 26 February 2015 at 23:05, Kojo Tero > wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found

It’s an old left over from Qt 1 days. Let’s get rid of it. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/107400/ Cheers, Lars From: Gunnar Roth mailto:gunnar.r...@gmx.de>> Date: Friday 27 February 2015 08:40 To: "development@qt-project.org" mailto:development@qt-proje

Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available

On 26 February 2015 at 23:05, Kojo Tero wrote: > Hello, > > > > We just opened the new Qt Wiki at http://wiki.qt.io > > > > You can find the details in the blog post: > > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/02/26/new-qt-wiki-now-available/ > > > > In short, it’s a mediawiki instance, you use Qt Account to

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

Hi, >  in fact both C++11 and C++14 have improved the ways in which the new/delete > operators can be overridden. can you give me some links describing these improvements? regards, Gunnar Roth   ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Git clone hangs on Linux using SSH

26.02.2015, 22:23, "Thiago Macieira" : >  On Thursday 26 February 2015 22:00:21 Denis Shienkov wrote: >>>   Don't clone from the Gerrit server. Clone from Gitorious, GitHub or >>   one of the other mirrors. >> >>   Hmm? I'm sorry, but what about this instructions: >>   http://qt-project.org/wiki/Ge

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

In that case they cannot be overwritten without a recompile. Which brings me back to my original comment from yesterday (to which no one replied): How is that different from linking a custom implementation of operator new/operator delete and malloc/free into Qt? These are embedded use-cases any

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Robin Burchell > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:47 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> The argument is that it implies runtime overhead. See Robin's email for >> numbers. This is asking for making the code slower on the very devices where >> it needs to run faster. >> > i don't trust this number. i don't know how qMalloc

Re: [Development] Git clone hangs on Linux using SSH

On 26 February 2015 at 21:09, Denis Shienkov wrote: > [denis@pclab qtserialport]$ scp -P 443 > @codereview.qt-project.org:hooks/commit-msg .git/hooks > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host Sorry, I did not mean to use ssh on the https port, but to use "plain" https. (And

Re: [Development] How to QNAM from the WebCore jungles?

On Thursday 26 February 2015 18:56:31 Ilya Kowalewski wrote: > Hiho, > > I am looking for a way to fetch some resources from WebCore sources > (QtWebKit) with QNAM. I want it to be associated with user-agent of > QWebView and referrer of QWebPage. Is there a way to handle this? Hello Ilya This i

Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki Now Available

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+tero.kojo=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+tero.kojo=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: 26. helmikuuta 2015 20:42 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Developme

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:12:27PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2015 20:54:32 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > Let me put it this way: who's going to write the unit tests to ensure we > > > get coverage for all those conditionals? Any volunteers? > > > > which conditional