On Friday 27 February 2015 11:15:03 Al-Khanji Louai wrote: > In that case they cannot be overwritten without a recompile. Which brings me > back to my original comment from yesterday (to which no one replied): > > How is that different from linking a custom implementation of operator > new/operator delete and malloc/free into Qt?
It isn't. That's a MUCH easier solution: just replace malloc and make it abort() on failure instead of returning NULL. This has the following advantages: * works for ALL libraries in the process, whether they handle malloc failures or not * works for operator new of all forms, since they just call malloc * requires no code change anywhere -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
