Hi Thiago > >> the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells >> commercial customers. they they if you use modules which are under >> commrcial license as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about >> anything used in there. > > There's a page in the Qt documentation that lists all the documentation > requirements.
Yes that is the page . http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/3rdparty.html <http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/3rdparty.html> i mentioned and as i wrote this page does not contain the Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Daniel M. Duley so how should a customer know he needs to mention it? > >> The Digia legal counsel Topi Ruotsalainen tells in >> https://devdays.kdab.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/Qt_license_options_FINAL_2 >> 0121114.pdf page 14 >> >> Qt Commercial can be used „silently‟ to create products ● t is No need to >> mention >> in documentation, end-user license, to provide source code etc. that LGPL >> requires > Because it's not LGPL requirement. > What is NOT lpgl requirement? > You still have to observe the BSD 2- and 3-clause requirement to reproduce > the > copyright notice. > Well i read it like this: Qt Commercial can be used „silently‟ to create products. No need to mention documentation. So how is that silent if i need to add a lot of copyright notices which i also have to find myself by scanning the qtbase source code? Regards, Gunnar
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
