Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/4/21 2:37 pm, Richi Dubey wrote: > Cool, I tried building uboot for the board from this > repo: https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx > , and the instructions for zcu106 are > here:  > https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/blob/master/doc/board/xilinx/zy

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-20 Thread Richi Dubey
x3 : 0020 >>> >>> x4 : x5 : 0030 >>> >>> x6 : 7fe7e9cd x7 : 000f >>> >>> x8 : 0038 x9 : 0008 >>> >>> x10: 7ddbd530 x11: ffd0 >>> >>> x1

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-20 Thread Kinsey Moore
l 14, 2021 3:22 PM *To:* Kinsey Moore mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>> *Cc:* rtems-de...@rtems.org <mailto:rtems-de...@rtems.org> mailto:devel@rtems.org>> *Subject:* Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-20 Thread Richi Dubey
0 >> >> x22: 071f x23: 7fe04a20 >> >> x24: 0001 x25: 7ddbd2f8 >> >> x26: 00007fe9ac18 x27: 0030 >> >> x28: 0340 x29: 7dda07c0 >> >> >> >> Resetting CPU ..

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-19 Thread Kinsey Moore
Sent:* Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:22 PM *To:* Kinsey Moore mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>> *Cc:* rtems-de...@rtems.org <mailto:rtems-de...@rtems.org> mailto:devel@rtems.org>> *Subject:* Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 b

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-18 Thread Richi Dubey
chi, >> >> >> >> In your log it says: >> >> >> >> Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) >> >> >> >> At least for our zedboard devices we use the following main options for >> mkimage. >> >> &g

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Kinsey Moore
org> mailto:devel@rtems.org>> *Subject:* Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board Trying to boot directly from the .img  file also fails: ZynqMP> tftpboot 0x300 rdubey/sp01.img Using ethernet@ff0e device TFTP from server

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Richi Dubey
el *On Behalf Of *Richi Dubey > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:22 PM > *To:* Kinsey Moore > *Cc:* rtems-de...@rtems.org > *Subject:* Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board > > > > Trying to boot directly from the .img file also fails: >

RE: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Jan.Sommer
difference between -O rtems and -O linux is subtle, but maybe that helps. Best regards, Jan From: devel On Behalf Of Richi Dubey Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:22 PM To: Kinsey Moore Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board Trying

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Kinsey Moore
*To:* Kinsey Moore mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>>; rtems-de...@rtems.org <mailto:rtems-de...@rtems.org> mailto:devel@rtems.org>> *Subject:* Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board Hi, I followed the 8.2.23 docs <https://docs.rtems.org/br

Re: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Richi Dubey
.@rtems.org < > devel@rtems.org> > *Subject:* Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board > > > > Hi, > > > > I followed the 8.2.23 docs > <https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/bsps-arm.html#xilinx-zynqmp> > to > build rtems

RE: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-14 Thread Kinsey Moore
Subject: Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board Hi, I followed the 8.2.23 docs<https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/bsps-arm.html#xilinx-zynqmp> to build rtems for the xilinx_zynqmp_ultra96 bsp since it was the only bsp corresponding to xilinx-zynqmp

Booting a rtems exe on Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC ZCU106 board

2021-04-13 Thread Richi Dubey
Hi, I followed the 8.2.23 docs to build rtems for the xilinx_zynqmp_ultra96 bsp since it was the only bsp corresponding to xilinx-zynqmp in the rtems-bsp. Then I followed the boot via Uboot section 8.2.1.1 on docs

Re: Zynq Ultrascale+

2019-12-10 Thread Jeff Kubascik
Hello Matthew, On 12/8/2019 2:15 PM, Mathew Benson wrote: > My new board arrived so I'm shelving the OcPoC (Zynq 7020) to focus on the > new Zynq Ultrascale+. > > https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TE0820-03-2AI21FA-MPSoC-Module-with-Xilinx-Zynq-UltraScale-ZU2CG-1I-2-GByte-DD

Zynq Ultrascale+

2019-12-08 Thread Mathew Benson
My new board arrived so I'm shelving the OcPoC (Zynq 7020) to focus on the new Zynq Ultrascale+. https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TE0820-03-2AI21FA-MPSoC-Module-with-Xilinx-Zynq-UltraScale-ZU2CG-1I-2-GByte-DDR4-SDRAM-4-x-5-cm Has anybody ported RTEMS to the Zynq Ultrascale+? I saw

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Jeff, On 11/04/2019 01:38, Jeff Kubascik wrote: From: Jeff Kubascik This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. The first two patches move the zynq-uart driver into a common directory, so that both the xilinx-zynq and xilinx-zynqmp BSPs can use it

[PATCH v2 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-10 Thread Jeff Kubascik
From: Jeff Kubascik This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. The first two patches move the zynq-uart driver into a common directory, so that both the xilinx-zynq and xilinx-zynqmp BSPs can use it. The third patch copies the xilinx-zynq BSP layer to

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/04/2019 15:36, Jeff Kubascik wrote: On 4/8/2019 1:20 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/04/2019 02:53, Jeff Kubascik wrote: From: Jeff Kubascik This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. The first two patches move the zynq-uart driver into a

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-08 Thread Jeff Kubascik
On 4/8/2019 1:20 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/04/2019 02:53, Jeff Kubascik wrote: >> From: Jeff Kubascik >> >> This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ >> MPSoC. >> >> The first two patches move the zynq-uart driv

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06/04/2019 02:53, Jeff Kubascik wrote: From: Jeff Kubascik This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. The first two patches move the zynq-uart driver into a common directory, so that both the xilinx-zynq and xilinx-zynqmp BSPs can use it. The third

[PATCH 0/4] Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC BSP

2019-04-05 Thread Jeff Kubascik
From: Jeff Kubascik This set of patches creates a new BSP layer for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. The first two patches move the zynq-uart driver into a common directory, so that both the xilinx-zynq and xilinx-zynqmp BSPs can use it. The third patch copies the xilinx-zynq BSP layer to

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-02-01 Thread Joel Sherrill
rrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:34 AM Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ >>> MPSoC p

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-02-01 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/02/2019 15:04, Alan Cudmore wrote: For the A53, is there a reason for choosing Aarch32 vs Aarch64 for the RTEMS port? The AArch64 is a new architecture. For the AArch32 we can hopefully use the existing stuff from the ARM port. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornie

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-02-01 Thread Alan Cudmore
ian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ >> MPSoC platform: >> >> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682 >> >> Please let me know, if you are

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-01-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:34 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ > MPSoC platform: > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682 > > Please let me know, if you are

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-01-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/01/2019 15:11, emanuel stiebler wrote: Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5 processors or AArch64 mode. I think, the AARch64 is more rewarding, as the R5 should be easy afterwards (same peripherals(?)). And I think we discussed it already before, the big

Re: BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-01-23 Thread emanuel stiebler
On 2019-01-23 03:34, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ > MPSoC platform: > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682 Excellent! > Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5 > proce

BSP for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform

2019-01-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC platform: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682 Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5 processors or AArch64 mode. The development platform will be this evaluation kit: https