On 10/21/2015 12:41 AM, Thomas Dörfler wrote:
I have discussed dropping BSPs from support and from a technical point I
fully agree that this must be done. We should have some sort of active
BSPs which are regularily tested.
On the other hand, RTEMS can only live and grow, if it is attrative
en
On 21/10/15 01:24, Chris Johns wrote:
On 21/10/2015 12:56 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/20/2015 6:15 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Maybe we should build a list of BSP directories and find maintainers for
each directory in some time frame. Then remove all BSPs without a
maintainer.
That is one
I have discussed dropping BSPs from support and from a technical point I
fully agree that this must be done. We should have some sort of active
BSPs which are regularily tested.
On the other hand, RTEMS can only live and grow, if it is attrative
enough for new users. Therefore we should not si
On 21/10/2015 12:56 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 6:15 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Maybe we should build a list of BSP directories and find maintainers for
>> each directory in some time frame. Then remove all BSPs without a
>> maintainer.
>
> That is one approach. Another is defining
On 10/20/2015 6:15 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hallo,
I would remove all 16-bit or less targets.
I previously posted suggesting the avr, h8300, and m32r be
removed. No one has commented so far.
I want to write two wiki pages as I go. One on removing a
BSP and another on removing an architec
Hallo,
I would remove all 16-bit or less targets.
Maybe we should build a list of BSP directories and find maintainers for
each directory in some time frame. Then remove all BSPs without a
maintainer.
On 14/10/15 02:06, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove
On October 13, 2015 8:24:32 PM CDT, Chris Johns wrote:
>On 14/10/2015 11:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove. If you
>> have used a BSP in the past but no longer use it, please
>> speak up. BSPs with no users are baggage to the project.
>>
>> If you hav
On 14/10/2015 11:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove. If you
> have used a BSP in the past but no longer use it, please
> speak up. BSPs with no users are baggage to the project.
>
> If you have suggestions for other reasons, please speak up
> as well. EOLe
Hi
I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove. If you
have used a BSP in the past but no longer use it, please
speak up. BSPs with no users are baggage to the project.
If you have suggestions for other reasons, please speak up
as well. EOLed boards that no one can have, custom
variants that
