On 10/20/2015 6:15 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hallo,
I would remove all 16-bit or less targets.
I previously posted suggesting the avr, h8300, and m32r be
removed. No one has commented so far.
I want to write two wiki pages as I go. One on removing a
BSP and another on removing an architecture.
Maybe we should build a list of BSP directories and find maintainers for
each directory in some time frame. Then remove all BSPs without a
maintainer.
That is one approach. Another is defining tiers for the BSP
and being more aggressive about dropping them.
I think Chris has discussed his ideas on tiers before.
On 14/10/15 02:06, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove. If you
have used a BSP in the past but no longer use it, please
speak up. BSPs with no users are baggage to the project.
If you have suggestions for other reasons, please speak up
as well. EOLed boards that no one can have, custom
variants that are no longer in use, etc.
Help reduce the maintenance!
Thanks.
--joel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
