On October 13, 2015 8:24:32 PM CDT, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >On 14/10/2015 11:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> I am looking for suggestions on BSPs to remove. If you >> have used a BSP in the past but no longer use it, please >> speak up. BSPs with no users are baggage to the project. >> >> If you have suggestions for other reasons, please speak up >> as well. EOLed boards that no one can have, custom >> variants that are no longer in use, etc. >> >> Help reduce the maintenance! > >ods68302 and some of the older m68k BSPs?
I think so. Mvme136 and sin68000 are also options. We can go architecture by architecture but we probably need a timeout from announcement to removing. Not terribly long but time. >Do we have a list of BSPs we can actually test? It is easy to prepare a list that we know run on simulators. From there, it is a matter of who has what boards and can commit to regular testing. Obviously, long term we need a better solution. Buildbot with instructions on building a remotely controlled board for testing. >Chris >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >devel@rtems.org >http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel --joel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
