On 7/21/2014 12:54 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 07/21/2014 07:23 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Unless the chain has changed to have the property of
>> "dangerous to extract if not on", this should be OK.
>>
>> My thinking is that higher level code would be checking a state
>> of some sort and kno
On 07/21/2014 07:23 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Unless the chain has changed to have the property of
"dangerous to extract if not on", this should be OK.
My thinking is that higher level code would be checking a state
of some sort and know whether to extract from the underlying
chain or rbtree cont
Unless the chain has changed to have the property of
"dangerous to extract if not on", this should be OK.
My thinking is that higher level code would be checking a state
of some sort and know whether to extract from the underlying
chain or rbtree container.
Is this true? If so, this looks OK.
O
