On 7/21/2014 12:54 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/21/2014 07:23 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Unless the chain has changed to have the property of >> "dangerous to extract if not on", this should be OK. >> >> My thinking is that higher level code would be checking a state >> of some sort and know whether to extract from the underlying >> chain or rbtree container. >> >> Is this true? If so, this looks OK. > Yes, this is analogous to the chains. The lowest level implementation > should not do consistency checks (except via _Assert()). > Thanks. Then OK.
-- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel