On 07/21/2014 07:23 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Unless the chain has changed to have the property of
"dangerous to extract if not on", this should be OK.
My thinking is that higher level code would be checking a state
of some sort and know whether to extract from the underlying
chain or rbtree container.
Is this true? If so, this looks OK.
Yes, this is analogous to the chains. The lowest level implementation
should not do consistency checks (except via _Assert()).
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
