On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 6:10 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 26/2/20 8:00 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:38 AM suyash singh
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes it is showing for unused values
> >>
> >> For example at line 262 in
> https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInsta
On 26/2/20 8:00 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:38 AM suyash singh wrote:
>>
>> Yes it is showing for unused values
>>
>> For example at line 262 in
>> https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&mergedDefectId=139975
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 3:00 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:38 AM suyash singh
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes it is showing for unused values
> >
> > For example at line 262 in
> https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&merge
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:38 AM suyash singh wrote:
>
> Yes it is showing for unused values
>
> For example at line 262 in
> https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&mergedDefectId=1399751
>
That appears to be legitimate. Analysis now
Yes it is showing for unused values
For example at line 262 in
https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&mergedDefectId=1399751
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:21 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:47 AM suyash singh
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:47 AM suyash singh
wrote:
> Coverity shows value_overwrite errors for variables which are reassigned
> new values. What should be the procedure to prevent these?
>
When I have seen these in the past, they indicate a case where a variable
is assigned
and assigned later w
Coverity shows value_overwrite errors for variables which are reassigned
new values. What should be the procedure to prevent these?
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
