On 26/2/20 8:00 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:38 AM suyash singh <suyashsingh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes it is showing for unused values >> >> For example at line 262 in >> https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&mergedDefectId=1399751 >> > That appears to be legitimate. Analysis now has to be made whether the > value written should have been consumed somewhere, or if it is OK to > remove the assignment.
This is imported code. Should upstream be checked first to see if there is a newer version? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
