Yes it is showing for unused values For example at line 262 in https://scan5.coverity.com/reports.htm#v53137/p10069/fileInstanceId=164938787&defectInstanceId=45953284&mergedDefectId=1399751
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:21 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:47 AM suyash singh <suyashsingh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Coverity shows value_overwrite errors for variables which are reassigned >> new values. What should be the procedure to prevent these? >> > > When I have seen these in the past, they indicate a case where a variable > is assigned > and assigned later without the first value being used. Is this what you > are seeing? > > What file and line? > > We sometimes assign a variable 0 when declaring it to avoid gcc warning > about used > before initialized. It wouldn't surprise me if Scan didn't always like > that. > > --joel > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
