Much better, thanks. I should have read all the email first, I was getting
caught up on the last few days. I recall you asked about doing that.
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 06:11 , Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>
> On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote:
>> I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests befo
On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote:
I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how
do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's less likely
than other uses of this pattern.
Can the definition be made identical to the other def
I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how
do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's
less likely than other uses of this pattern.
Can the definition be made identical to the other definition to eliminate a
warning or does GC
---
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.h b/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.h
index 2f0f75f..26f0699 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.h
+++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.h
@@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ extern "C" {
#define CT_LE_L
