Much better, thanks. I should have read all the email first, I was getting caught up on the last few days. I recall you asked about doing that.
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 06:11 , Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote: >> I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because >> how do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so >> that's less likely than other uses of this pattern. >> >> Can the definition be made identical to the other definition to eliminate a >> warning or does GCC still warn about a redefinition? > > I fixed it this way: > > http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=11925eef789566a226d8eaacbceb4d89df787ebc Peter ----------------- Peter Dufault HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
