On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote:
I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how
do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's less likely
than other uses of this pattern.
Can the definition be made identical to the other definition to eliminate a
warning or does GCC still warn about a redefinition?
I fixed it this way:
http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=11925eef789566a226d8eaacbceb4d89df787ebc
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
