Re: [PATCH] Tester: Added pc386 bsp support

On 6/2/20 6:01 am, Lou Woods wrote: >> On 5/2/20 3:34 am, Lou Woods wrote: >>> Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. >> How does this differ from pc.ini? Why is a copy needed? > The bsp specified is different pc686 versus pc386. On second thought, perhaps > the patch can be discarded. The exec

RE: [PATCH] Tester: Added pc386 bsp support

> On 5/2/20 3:34 am, Lou Woods wrote: > > Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. > > How does this differ from pc.ini? Why is a copy needed? The bsp specified is different pc686 versus pc386. On second thought, perhaps the patch can be discarded. The execution is no different for the two BSPs,

Re: [PATCH] Tester: Added pc386 bsp support

On 5/2/20 3:34 am, Lou Woods wrote: > Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. How does this differ from pc.ini? Why is a copy needed? https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc.ini Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

[PATCH] Tester: Added pc386 bsp support

Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. --- tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc386.ini | 37 + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc386.ini diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc386.ini b/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc386