On 6/2/20 6:01 am, Lou Woods wrote: >> On 5/2/20 3:34 am, Lou Woods wrote: >>> Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. >> How does this differ from pc.ini? Why is a copy needed? > The bsp specified is different pc686 versus pc386. On second thought, perhaps > the patch can be discarded. The execution is no different for the two BSPs, > right? The only difference would be the BSP name on the test report, would > you agree?
Yes. These days I am not sure what value there is in all the PC variants. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
