> On 5/2/20 3:34 am, Lou Woods wrote: > > Added pc386 BSP support to rtems-tester. > > How does this differ from pc.ini? Why is a copy needed? The bsp specified is different pc686 versus pc386. On second thought, perhaps the patch can be discarded. The execution is no different for the two BSPs, right? The only difference would be the BSP name on the test report, would you agree? > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/pc.ini > > Chris
Lou _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
