On 10/08/2021 08:31, gro...@chichak.ca wrote:
../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6
--target=arm-rtems6 --with-rtems-bsp=stm32f4 --with-rtems-tests=yes
6/rtems-kernel
I usually build the tools with the RSB and then separately build the BSP
from a Git clone.
--
Hi Sebastian,
So far there is no code. The BSP won’t build. The only code is:
../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6
--target=arm-rtems6 --with-rtems-bsp=stm32f4 --with-rtems-tests=yes
6/rtems-kernel
Andrei
> On 2021-August-10, at 00:20, Sebastian Huber
>
In an attempt to make some progress, I’ve gone back to trying to install RTEMS6
built for STM32F4. Should be straight forward.
To make things clean, I don’t do any modifications to any of the code being
pulled out of git.
I followed the Quick Start section of the RTEMS User Manual, Release 6 ef
On 10/8/21 1:43 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> - Add PCI IO region support
>>
>> - Add support map buffers to PCI address space
>>
>> - Add BSP conditional IO space support. Some PC implementations
>> have PCI IO space mapped differently to memo
In an attempt to make some progress, I’ve gone back to trying to install RTEMS6
built for STM32F4. Should be straight forward.
To make things clean, I don’t do any modifications to any of the code being
pulled out of git.
I followed the Quick Start section of the RTEMS User Manual, Release 6 ef
On 9/8/21 10:48 pm, Ryan Long wrote:
> Without the global namespace prefix, it results in the following error
>
> ../linkers/rtems-exeinfo.cpp: In member function ‘void
> rld::exeinfo::image::output_compilation_unit(bool, bool)’:
> ../linkers/rtems-exeinfo.cpp:370:14: error: ‘rld::rtems::utils’ h
On 10/8/21 1:50 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> - Add the ability to check if an interface is up
>> ---
>> libbsd.py | 1 +
>> rtemsbsd/include/rtems/bsd/iface.h | 62
>> rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-bsd-iface.c
Joel: This looks fine to me.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:58 PM Zacchaeus Leung wrote:
>
> Closes #3889
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
> cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 3 +-
> cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 50 ---
> t
Closes #3889
---
cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 3 +-
cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 50 ---
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 ++
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtim
Closes #3889
---
cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 3 +-
cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 50 ---
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 ++
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxti
Closes #3888
---
cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 3 +-
cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 50 ---
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 ++
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtim
Your commit message was a little better before, just needed some
reformatting. This commit message you are using is not good, as
mentioned previously.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:44 PM Zacchaeus Leung
wrote:
>
> Closes #3888
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
> cpukit/po
Closes #3888
---
cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 1 +
cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 3 +-
cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 50 ---
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 ++
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtim
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 10:14 AM Pranav Dangi wrote:
> Hi joel,
> I had sent you a rebased patch as a direct attachment, I will ping that
> thread once again. Did that fail too?
>
I just pushed a patch you sent me directly. Is it ok on master now?
--joel
>
> Thanks,
> pranav
>
> On Mon, 9 Aug 202
Things look mostly fine to me. But the last patch:
kern/sys: Add NFSv4 client
* in the buildset configuration, should we use nfsv4 to be explicit?
Or you think 'nfs' is fine?
* freebsd/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_commonkrpc.c: there are random whitespace
changes without guards, and ws changes inside of #ifndef
Hi Zack,
Getting really close. I have just a few minor nits for you to fix up.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:15 PM Zacchaeus Leung wrote:
>
> the timer_create() method can use CLOCK_MONOTONIC but there was no test for
> this. Also it implements the functionality to
Wrap commit message lines before
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:18 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > I have to think about this. The approach taken here just replaces 5.1
> > -> 6, it isn't updating the screengrabs. This means the tutorial isn't
> > "real" but that might be fine.
>
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> - Add the ability to check if an interface is up
> ---
> libbsd.py | 1 +
> rtemsbsd/include/rtems/bsd/iface.h | 62
> rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-bsd-iface.c | 146 +
> 3 files c
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> - Add PCI IO region support
>
> - Add support map buffers to PCI address space
>
> - Add BSP conditional IO space support. Some PC implementations
> have PCI IO space mapped differently to memory space and this needs
> to be reflected in th
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> I have to think about this. The approach taken here just replaces 5.1
> -> 6, it isn't updating the screengrabs. This means the tutorial isn't
> "real" but that might be fine.
He can replace the screenshots but that is not worth the trouble
Hi joel,
I had sent you a rebased patch as a direct attachment, I will ping that
thread once again. Did that fail too?
Thanks,
pranav
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, 20:40 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:00 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:00 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > I'm doing a build sweep of all BSPs. When that completes, I plan to
> > push this unless there are comments.
> >
> Did/can you push this?
It doesn't apply for me. Co
I have to think about this. The approach taken here just replaces 5.1
-> 6, it isn't updating the screengrabs. This means the tutorial isn't
"real" but that might be fine.
The other issue is that when we release, then this has to become 6 ->
6.1 in the release, and 6 -> 7 in the master. How we man
Hi Joel,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I'm doing a build sweep of all BSPs. When that completes, I plan to
> push this unless there are comments.
>
Did/can you push this?
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:51 AM pranav wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > .../arm/altera-cyclone-v/bspalt
Without the global namespace prefix, it results in the following error
../linkers/rtems-exeinfo.cpp: In member function ‘void
rld::exeinfo::image::output_compilation_unit(bool, bool)’:
../linkers/rtems-exeinfo.cpp:370:14: error: ‘rld::rtems::utils’ has not been
declared
rtems::utils::ostr
The Pi firmware added a wfe(wait for event), the cores 1-3 wait
for the start address being written to the mailbox register, followed
by a SEV poke to the mailbox that acts as a wfe wake-up event.
---
bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/bspsmp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/
On 9/8/21 5:14 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 9/8/21 5:02 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>> Am 09.08.21 um 02:34 schrieb Chris Johns:
>>> On 1/8/21 9:27 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
Hello Husni,
just tested that and it works fine. With a simple curl I can reach abo
On 9/8/21 5:02 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Am 09.08.21 um 02:34 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 1/8/21 9:27 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>> Hello Husni,
>>>
>>> just tested that and it works fine. With a simple curl I can reach about 8.5
>>> MByte/s sending to the beagle and 19.5
Hello Chris,
Am 09.08.21 um 02:34 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 1/8/21 9:27 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
Hello Husni,
just tested that and it works fine. With a simple curl I can reach about 8.5
MByte/s sending to the beagle and 19.5 MByte/s receiving from it.
Please take a look at the points that
29 matches
Mail list logo