Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/04/2020 07:14, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/04/2020 00:59, Chris Johns wrote: This BSP and the libbsd build system are not good enough right now to add this BSP to an RSB build set. I agree the build system is lacking but I do not see that as the key issue that has been uncovered. The

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/04/2020 00:59, Chris Johns wrote: This BSP and the libbsd build system are not good enough right now to add this BSP to an RSB build set. I agree the build system is lacking but I do not see that as the key issue that has been uncovered. The main issue is the addition of "special" feat

Re: bare/qemu broken?

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
a few one-liners to try out, here's what I get (Ubuntu 18.04): $ perl --version 2>&1 | grep version | sed -e 's/.*(v\(.*\)).*/\1/' 5.26.1 $ perl --version 2>&1 | grep version | sed -e 's/.*perl \([0-9]*\),.*/\1/' 5 $perl --version 2>&1 | grep version | sed -e 's/.*version \([0-9]*\),.*/\1/'

Re: bare/qemu broken?

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 2020-04-08 11:20, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:44 PM Chris Johns wrote: On 2020-04-07 03:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:43 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: This is a problem caused by newer versions of pe

Re: bare/qemu broken?

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:44 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 2020-04-07 03:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:43 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> > >>> This is a problem caused by newer versions of perl. The unes

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 2020-04-07 23:36, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/04/2020 15:31, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/04/2020 15:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of what > works

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 2020-04-07 23:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > --- > > bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg | 4 > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg > b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg >

Re: bare/qemu broken?

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 2020-04-07 03:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:43 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: This is a problem caused by newer versions of perl. The unescaped { } in regex was deprecated and then eliminated. It requires an upstream fix

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 2020-04-07 23:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: --- bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg index 9ff7af5..bd5770a 100644 --- a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg ++

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 2:46 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:06 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 7,

Re: [PATCH] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
There is a ws error for adding a new line to end of .doc file, but that is fine. I tested on sis, looks good, pushed it. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:26 PM Eshan dhawan wrote: > > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 26 +-- > .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01

[PATCH 0/6] Add tests to various tcfg excludes

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
These patches are needed so all BSPs except epiphany can now build and link all tests with debug enabled. Joel Sherrill (6): lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxsignal07 lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxsignal07 lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxaoi03 and psxsignal07 lpc1768_mbed-te

[PATCH 5/6] mcf52235-testsuite.tcfg: Add sp16

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/m68k/mcf52235/config/mcf52235-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/bsps/m68k/mcf52235/config/mcf52235-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/m68k/mcf52235/config/mcf52235-testsuite.tcfg index 1343981..2a387b3 100644 --- a/bsps/m68k/mcf52235/config/mcf52235-tes

[PATCH 6/6] lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxaoi03 and psxsignal07

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg index d75ad36..990f74e 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/

[PATCH 4/6] lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxaoi03 and psxsignal07

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg index ae737d9..288ae38 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc176

[PATCH 2/6] lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxsignal07

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg index bc53c29..3fa1143 100644 --

[PATCH 1/6] lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxsignal07

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg index be14cde..b520567 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.t

[PATCH 3/6] lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg: Add psxaoi03 and psxsignal07

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Updates #3938. --- bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg index bd972f9..5717e8e 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc2362-testsuite.tcf

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:06 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7

RTEMS Timeline Update and 25th Anniversary of First Public Commit

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi The RTEMS Project is rapidly approaching a major milestone -- the 25th anniversary of the oldest commit in the git repository! That occurs on 4 May 2020! Before that time, the source code was managed on an internal research project repository and snapshots/releases made available via ftp. I kn

Re: [PATCH v6] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan Dhawan
Resolved the trailing whitespace issue in this patch. can you please check :) On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:58 AM Eshan dhawan wrote: > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 26 +-- > .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.doc | 10 ++- > 2 files changed, 33 i

[PATCH v6] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan dhawan
--- testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 26 +-- .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.doc | 10 ++- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c index 030aa2a

[PATCH] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan dhawan
--- testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 26 +-- .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.doc | 10 ++- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c index 030aa2a

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure what e

Re: [PATCH] Tests for pthread_getcpuclockid method

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:59 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Is there a ticket for psxgetcpuclockid? Linked from the psx compliance > ticket? > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:28 AM Eshan dhawan > wrote: > > > > If so the commit message should include > > Updates #. > > > --- > > testsuites/psxtests/Ma

Re: Need help to run a smp testsuite on erc32 with multi core

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:30 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > Can someone please help me out with running a smp testsuite on erc32(which > uses SPARC instruction set). I tried using sis, but the -m option for multi > core doesnt seem to work, as the sis readme says: "-m cores : Enable

Re: Need help to run a smp testsuite on erc32 with multi core

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:30 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Can someone please help me out with running a smp testsuite on erc32(which > uses SPARC instruction set). I tried using sis, but the -m option for multi > core doesnt seem to work, as the sis readme says: "-m cores : Enable the

Re: [PATCH] Tests for pthread_getcpuclockid method

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:29 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Is there a ticket for psxgetcpuclockid? Linked from the psx compliance > ticket? > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3891 --joel > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:28 AM Eshan dhawan > wrote: > > > > If so the commit message should include > > Updat

Need help to run a smp testsuite on erc32 with multi core

2020-04-07 Thread Richi Dubey
Hey everyone, Can someone please help me out with running a smp testsuite on erc32(which uses SPARC instruction set). I tried using sis, but the -m option for multi core doesnt seem to work, as the sis readme says: "-m cores : Enable the number of cores (2 - 4) in a leon3 or RISC-V multi-processor

Re: [PATCH] Tests for pthread_getcpuclockid method

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
Is there a ticket for psxgetcpuclockid? Linked from the psx compliance ticket? On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:28 AM Eshan dhawan wrote: > If so the commit message should include Updates #. > --- > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 10 ++ > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac

Re: [PATCH v5] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
Applying: Tests for inttype.h methods .git/rebase-apply/patch:14: trailing whitespace. * Copyright (C) 2020, Eshan Dhawan .git/rebase-apply/patch:29: trailing whitespace. .git/rebase-apply/patch:30: trailing whitespace. /* Test for imaxabs */ .git/rebase-apply/patch:34: trailing whitespace. .git

Re: [PATCH v5] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
It looks alright, I'm testing it now. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:13 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > I sent this patch a few days ago. > if anyone could look at it. > the code was tested by dr joel. > But had some style issues. > I have covered all the suggestions. > Do any more changes need to be made b

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm not sure what error this is fixing, is there a ticket open for the >>> warning? >> >> >> No id

Re: [PATCH v5] Tests for inttype.h methods

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan Dhawan
I sent this patch a few days ago. if anyone could look at it. the code was tested by dr joel. But had some style issues. I have covered all the suggestions. Do any more changes need to be made before it is merged? Thanks -Eshan On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:46 AM Eshan dhawan wrote: > --- > testsu

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure what error this is fixing, is there a ticket open for the >> warning? >> > > No idea on this. > >> >> Is there a fix for the warning besides squelching it? >> > > I

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > I'm not sure what error this is fixing, is there a ticket open for the > warning? > No idea on this. > > Is there a fix for the warning besides squelching it? > I think these are the warnings that are build failures on some hosts. > > H

Re: [PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
I'm not sure what error this is fixing, is there a ticket open for the warning? Is there a fix for the warning besides squelching it? How permanent is that gitlab? Should we just pluck these patches ourselves? On Tue, Apr 7, 2020, 7:59 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > --- > bare/config/devel/

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] score: Delete RTEMS_DECLARE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL()

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 17:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: This looks better to me. Good, I will build all BSPs with all tests overnight with this patch set. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] score: Delete RTEMS_DECLARE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL()

2020-04-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
This looks better to me. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:57 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Delete unused RTEMS_DECLARE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL(). > > Update #3799. > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 20 > testsuites/sptests/spmisc01/init.c| 7 --- > 2 files changed, 27 d

Re: [PATCH] rsb: Fix Spike build

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Please apply your Christian's and your patch. Also bump the dtc base package version number. I thought we settled on 1.4. --joel On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:56 AM Hesham Almatary wrote: > * There is no all$ target in Spike > * There is no longer --with-fesvr flag since fesvr is source-inlined >

[PATCH RSB] bare/glib-2.39.3-1: Add patches to suppress string literal warning

2020-04-07 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
--- bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg index 9ff7af5..bd5770a 100644 --- a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg +++ b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg @@ -14,6 +14,

Re: [PATCH] 5/bsps: Remove build set for atsamv

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 15:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: This just means it doesn't have a bset. It doesn't mean it works. It still is present in libbsd. It will just now fail when someone performs the same steps by hand. I don't see removing the bset as the solution. I do not propose removing it from lib

Re: [PATCH] 5/bsps: Remove build set for atsamv

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
This just means it doesn't have a bset. It doesn't mean it works. It still is present in libbsd. It will just now fail when someone performs the same steps by hand. I don't see removing the bset as the solution. I do not propose removing it from libbsd or the bsets. There needs to be a mechanism

[PATCH] 5/bsps: Remove build set for atsamv

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
It is not possible to build libbsd with the standard settings of this BSP. The BSP is also highly configurable and it is unlikely that the RSB built configuration runs on a custom board. --- rtems/config/5/bsps/atsamv.bset | 10 -- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 rtems

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 15:31, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/04/2020 15:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of what > works is important. The BSP runs on the evalua

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 15:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of what > works is important. The BSP runs on the evaluation board with default options. But it does

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:04 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 07/04/2020 08:24, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 2020-04-07 15:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> I am not sure what we should do with this one. The libbsd is well > >> supported on this BSP, however, with d

BSP bset Build Failures (atsamv and pc)

2020-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi It is hard to keep up so here's a summary post of build failures for the BSP bsets. For those keeping track, it took 7.5 hours of build time on a fast machine, just to learn that the atsamv and pc BSP bsets fail to build but the others do. RSB is at this commit: commit 8223d3b7c02e48d2bec19c4

[PATCH] Tests for pthread_getcpuclockid method

2020-04-07 Thread Eshan dhawan
--- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 10 ++ testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + testsuites/psxtests/psxgetcpuclockid01/init.c | 96 +++ .../psxgetcpuclockid01/psxgetcpuclockid01.doc | 19 .../psxgetcpuclockid01/psxgetcpuclockid01.scn | 4 + 5

[PATCH] rsb: Fix Spike build

2020-04-07 Thread Hesham Almatary
* There is no all$ target in Spike * There is no longer --with-fesvr flag since fesvr is source-inlined by default --- source-builder/config/spike-1-1.cfg | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/config/spike-1-1.cfg b/source-builder/config/spike-1-1

[PATCH v2 2/3] config: Fix _ISR_Stack_area_end

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
Update #3799. --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/percpu.h | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/percpu.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/percpu.h index 730571b54a..f3a9a4f3e7 100644 --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/perc

[PATCH v2 1/3] score: Add and use RTEMS_SYMBOL_NAME()

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
Update #3799. --- cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 24 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h index 4589bea4aa..0a4ac8e415 100644 --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/

[PATCH v2 3/3] score: Delete RTEMS_DECLARE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL()

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
Delete unused RTEMS_DECLARE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL(). Update #3799. --- cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 20 testsuites/sptests/spmisc01/init.c| 7 --- 2 files changed, 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/ba

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS: Improve GCC specification

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 09:29, Sebastian Huber wrote: Add a start/end file specification if the -qrtems option is present. Allow targets to customize it. Support the standard -nodefaultlibs option. gcc/ * config/rs6000/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define. (RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewi

[PATCH] RTEMS: Improve GCC specification

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
Add a start/end file specification if the -qrtems option is present. Allow targets to customize it. Support the standard -nodefaultlibs option. gcc/ * config/rs6000/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define. (RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise. * config/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_

Re: Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

2020-04-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/04/2020 08:24, Chris Johns wrote: On 2020-04-07 15:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: I am not sure what we should do with this one. The libbsd is well supported on this BSP, however, with default options, the BSP has not enough memory to link all the libbsd tests. For this BSP you likely have