On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:04 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> > On 07/04/2020 08:24, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 2020-04-07 15:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> I am not sure what we should do with this one. The libbsd is well > >> supported on this BSP, however, with default options, the BSP has not > >> enough memory to link all the libbsd tests. For this BSP you likely > >> have to specify some BSP options to build it for your target. > > > > What options are required to build libbsd for this BSP? If you say it > > is well supported a suitable configuration should be possible. The > > User manual provides no supporting details. > > > > Hmmm ... I have not looked at this BSP before now ... > > > > ... I see there is README and it contains special options I have never > > seen before such as `--enable-chip`. I am now wondering how many other > > magic BSP options exist? Do you know? > > My approach to this documentation issue was to address this in the new > build system. The build specification can be used to generate the user > manual sections for the BSPs. > > > > > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see > > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of what > > works is important. > The BSP runs on the evaluation board with default options. > But it doesn't build to completion? Why would someone assume a build that fails produces a working set of exes? --joel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
