Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/beagle: SPI driver

Hello Pierre-Louis, thanks for your SPI driver. We have a new framework for SPI drivers in RTEMS which is compatible to the Linux user-space API: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/spi.html It would be great if you could convert your new driver to use this framework. In case yo

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

On 26/02/2019 00:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > OPERATION_COUNT is usually the number of objects (e.g. tasks, semaphores, > etc) created so it is the maximum object count. For example, tm03 has this: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/tmtests/tm03/system.h#n2

Re: [PATCH 6/6] user: Remove nit-picky warnings.

On 26/02/2019 01:36, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/2/19 10:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:51 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: On 26/2/19 9:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org> >

Re: [PATCH] libdebugger: Fix for ARMv7-M with -O0 optimization

On 25/02/2019 22:46, Chris Johns wrote: Hi, The patch looks like it is masking something but I am not sure. What are the errors at -O0 the patch is attempting to resolve? Which BSP is showing the issue? What is the multilib ARM arch? The ARMv7-M is affected by this. Are these errors seen

Re: [PATCH 6/6] user: Remove nit-picky warnings.

On 26/2/19 10:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:51 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 26/2/19 9:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Chris Johns > >

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:58 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/2/19 9:07 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 26/2/19 4:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 a

Re: [PATCH 6/6] user: Remove nit-picky warnings.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:51 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/2/19 9:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 22/2/19 5:46 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 21/02/2019 22:20, Chris Johns wrote: > > >> On

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

On 26/2/19 9:07 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 26/2/19 4:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the failure > set > > dropped to these: > > > >

Re: [PATCH 6/6] user: Remove nit-picky warnings.

On 26/2/19 9:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 22/2/19 5:46 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 21/02/2019 22:20, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 21/2/19 5:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> On 21/02/2019 0

Re: [PATCH 6/6] user: Remove nit-picky warnings.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 22/2/19 5:46 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 21/02/2019 22:20, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 21/2/19 5:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> On 21/02/2019 03:43,chr...@rtems.org wrote: > diff --git a/user/bsps/bsps-powerpc.rst b/user/bsps

[PATCH 2/2] arm/beagle: Fix sdcard.sh tool

--- bsps/arm/beagle/simscripts/sdcard.sh | 16 +--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/simscripts/sdcard.sh b/bsps/arm/beagle/simscripts/sdcard.sh index 83e3807cc7..13371efa0e 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/beagle/simscripts/sdcard.sh +++ b/bsps/arm/b

[PATCH 1/2] arm/beagle: SPI driver

--- bsps/arm/beagle/headers.am | 1 + bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp.h | 4 +- bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp/spi.h | 144 +++ bsps/arm/beagle/spi/spi.c | 535 bsps/arm/include/libcpu/am335x.h| 93 +++- c/src/lib/libbsp

BeagleBone Black SPI support

Hello, As part of a school project I wrote an SPI driver for the BBB. Following mails contain a patch for it, and one to fix the sdcard.sh utility. -- Pierre-Louis Garnier ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/2/19 4:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the failure set > > dropped to these: > > > > gmake[5]: *** [capture.exe] Error 1 > > gmake[5]: *** [loopback.exe] Error 1 > > gmake[5]: ***

Re: [PATCH] libdebugger: Fix for ARMv7-M with -O0 optimization

Hi, The patch looks like it is masking something but I am not sure. What are the errors at -O0 the patch is attempting to resolve? Which BSP is showing the issue? What is the multilib ARM arch? Are these errors seen at -O2 and if not why does -O0 cause them? The intention is for the ARM back e

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

On 26/2/19 4:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the failure set > dropped to these: > > gmake[5]: *** [capture.exe] Error 1 > gmake[5]: *** [loopback.exe] Error 1 > gmake[5]: *** [block08.exe] Error 1 > gmake[5]: *** [top.exe] Error 1 > gmake[5]

GSoC 2019 Aspirant

Hi, I am interested in the following project for GSoC 2019. https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2899 Please let me know the status of the project. Is it available for GSoC project? Thanks -- *Ravindra Kumar Meena*, B. Tech. Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian Sc

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the failure set dropped to these: gmake[5]: *** [capture.exe] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** [loopback.exe] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** [block08.exe] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** [top.exe] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** [sp47.exe] Error 1 gmake[5]: *** [sp71.exe] Error 1

Re: GSOC Aspirant

Hi Ravindra Meena, On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 6:45 AM Ravindra Meena wrote: > Hi, > > I have already successfully completed the "hello world" challenge. Now I > want to work on some open projects available here. > > https://devel.rtems.org/query?status=!closed&desc=1&keywords=~SoC&report=10 > > Som

Re: [PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

The tmtests should fit if the OPERATION_COUNT is lowered for these BSPs. https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/tmtests/configure.ac#n27 Right now, this is set on the configure command line. Perhaps the BSP needs to provide an override if RAM is ilght. For others, it would be good to know w

[PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests

--- .../arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg | 79 -- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg index c093fa1903..30a16a7535 100644 --- a/bs

[PATCH] bsp/mpc5643l_dpu: Disable unsupported tests

--- .../mpc55xxevb/config/mpc5643l_dpu-testsuite.tcfg | 54 ++ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc5643l_dpu-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc5643l_dpu-testsuite.tcfg index 84d7efad7b..32c8c84aee 100644 --- a/bsps

[PATCH] bsp/lm4f120: Disable unsupported tests

--- bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg | 70 ++--- 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm4f120-testsuite.tcfg index 8eafa26328..0c074d04ef 100644 --- a/bsps/arm/l

[PATCH] libdebugger: Fix for ARMv7-M with -O0 optimization

--- cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c | 14 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c b/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c index 722dd54924..95e26ada76 100644 --- a/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c +++ b/

GSOC Aspirant

Hi, I have already successfully completed the "hello world" challenge. Now I want to work on some open projects available here. https://devel.rtems.org/query?status=!closed&desc=1&keywords=~SoC&report=10 Some of these projects were opened one or two years ago. Are these projects still available

[PATCH] ClangFormat in Coding Conventions and ClangFormat table in Appendix B

From 0760ede8cf14fb2bc2d6d670c18af63b7fd7d7b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikail Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:26:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ClangFormat in Coding Conventions and ClangFormat table in Appendix B --- eng/appendix-a.rst | 2 +- eng/appendix-b.rst | 138 +++