The tmtests should fit if the OPERATION_COUNT is lowered for these BSPs.

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/tmtests/configure.ac#n27

Right now, this is set on the configure command line. Perhaps the BSP needs
to provide
an override if RAM is ilght.

For others, it would be good to know why a test for a specific functional
area doesn't fit.
If we are unable to test a core capability on lower memory targets, then we
should split
the test or rework it. I'm not worried about dl* on low memory BSPs.

But addressing the OPERATION_COUNT for these BSPs would knock off most of
the
list.

Can we find a solution to at least that before this goes in?

--joel

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> ---
>  .../arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg | 79
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
> b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
> index c093fa1903..30a16a7535 100644
> --- a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
> +++ b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
> @@ -7,15 +7,80 @@
>  include: testdata/disable-iconv-tests.tcfg
>  include: testdata/disable-jffs2-tests.tcfg
>
> +exclude: block08
> +exclude: capture
>  exclude: dl07
> +exclude: dl08
> +exclude: dl09
> +exclude: fileio
>  exclude: flashdisk01
> -exclude: ftp01
> -exclude: utf8proc01
> -exclude: spstkalloc02
>  exclude: fsdosfsname01
> +exclude: ftp01
>  exclude: linpack
> -exclude: pppd
> +exclude: loopback
>  exclude: mghttpd01
> -exclude: tmfine01
> -exclude: iostream
> -exclude: rtems++
> +exclude: pppd
> +exclude: psxaio01
> +exclude: psxaio02
> +exclude: psxaio03
> +exclude: psxconfig01
> +exclude: psxtmbarrier02
> +exclude: psxtmclocknanosleep02
> +exclude: psxtmclocknanosleep03
> +exclude: psxtmcond08
> +exclude: psxtmcond09
> +exclude: psxtmcond10
> +exclude: psxtmmqrcvblock01
> +exclude: psxtmmqrcvblock02
> +exclude: psxtmmutex02
> +exclude: psxtmmutex04
> +exclude: psxtmmutex06
> +exclude: psxtmnanosleep02
> +exclude: psxtmrwlock02
> +exclude: psxtmrwlock03
> +exclude: psxtmrwlock04
> +exclude: psxtmrwlock05
> +exclude: psxtmrwlock07
> +exclude: psxtmsem03
> +exclude: psxtmsem05
> +exclude: psxtmsleep02
> +exclude: psxtmthread01
> +exclude: psxtmthread03
> +exclude: sp16
> +exclude: sp25
> +exclude: sp42
> +exclude: sp47
> +exclude: sp48
> +exclude: sp71
> +exclude: spstkalloc02
> +exclude: sptimecounter02
> +exclude: sptimecounter03
> +exclude: tm02
> +exclude: tm03
> +exclude: tm04
> +exclude: tm05
> +exclude: tm06
> +exclude: tm07
> +exclude: tm10
> +exclude: tm11
> +exclude: tm12
> +exclude: tm13
> +exclude: tm14
> +exclude: tm15
> +exclude: tm16
> +exclude: tm17
> +exclude: tm18
> +exclude: tm21
> +exclude: tm23
> +exclude: tm24
> +exclude: tm25
> +exclude: tm26
> +exclude: tm29
> +exclude: tm31
> +exclude: tm32
> +exclude: tm33
> +exclude: tm34
> +exclude: tm35
> +exclude: tm36
> +exclude: tmcontext01
> +exclude: top
> --
> 2.16.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to