[PATCH] libnetworking: Send the hostname if set in the network configuration.

This allows a suitably configured DHCP server with DDNS to enter the name into the DNS table making it addressiable via it's host name. --- cpukit/libnetworking/rtems/rtems_dhcp.c | 19 +-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libnetworking/rtems/rt

Re: 4.11 Branching

On 5/05/2015 4:38 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On May 4, 2015 1:36:42 PM CDT, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> There is for sure a lot to do before the release, but in terms of >> features the master branch is ready to turn into the 4.11 branch. We >> can do all release related stuff on this branch.

Re: [RPI BSP] resume, plan and questions for fb, fbcon gtk

Hi YANG Qiao and fellow mentors, > On May 4, 2015, at 7:08 PM, QIAO YANG wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Since I haven't yet received any respond of my last mail and I've now got the > names of mentors who would instruct me, I create a new thread for a simple > resume and post my questions . >

[RPI BSP] resume, plan and questions for fb, fbcon gtk

Hello everyone, Since I haven't yet received any respond of my last mail and I've now got the names of mentors who would instruct me, I create a new thread for a simple resume and post my questions . First of all, I've managed to use mailbox channel to get a framebuffer pointer and its inform

Re: [PATCH] [RSB] Add support for building Epiphany tools

On 4/05/2015 9:00 pm, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 4/05/2015 12:10 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at

[PATCH 3/3] cache_manager.c: Make _CPU_cache_invalidate_instruction_range() static

--- c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c b/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c index 003d010..b5d07e5 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c +++ b/c/

[PATCH 2/3] mrm332-testsuite.tcfg: Add fileio

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332-testsuite.tcfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332-testsuite.tcfg index 65804b7..6256f7e 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/libb

[PATCH 1/3] shared/src/cache_manager.c: Make prototype match that in header

At least all m68k BSPs were not compiling without this fix. --- c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c b/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c index 202ea8e..003d010 100644 -

Re: 4.11 Branching

On May 4, 2015 1:36:42 PM CDT, Sebastian Huber wrote: >There is for sure a lot to do before the release, but in terms of >features the master branch is ready to turn into the 4.11 branch. We >can do all release related stuff on this branch. With Git it is easy >to back port changes provided t

Re: 4.11 Branching

There is for sure a lot to do before the release, but in terms of features the master branch is ready to turn into the 4.11 branch. We can do all release related stuff on this branch. With Git it is easy to back port changes provided the file system structure remains intact. There is no need t

Re: 4.11 Branching

Sorry to reply again. On 5/4/2015 9:24 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Thomas Doerfler > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am glad 4.11 will be branched soon. from our side, branching is ok. >> So: Any open items left? Anything we can do to make the branch happen >> soon? Any chanc

Re: 4.11 Branching

On 5/4/2015 9:24 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Thomas Doerfler > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am glad 4.11 will be branched soon. from our side, branching is ok. >> So: Any open items left? Anything we can do to make the branch happen >> soon? Any chance to do the branch wit

Re: 4.11 Branching

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Thomas Doerfler wrote: > Hi, > > I am glad 4.11 will be branched soon. from our side, branching is ok. > So: Any open items left? Anything we can do to make the branch happen > soon? Any chance to do the branch within this week? > I get the feeling now the holdup is

[PATCH 2/2] [RSB] Add support for building Epiphany tools

This patch adds support for building Epiphany tools. Currently the tools are fetched from Adapteva repositories. In the future, the tools should be fetched from GNU upstreams when Adapteva folks push their latest changes there. --- rtems/config/4.11/rtems-epiphany.bset | 48 +++

[PATCH 1/2] [RSB] Modify GNU's common backend configuration files to build from external sources

--- source-builder/config/binutils-2-1.cfg | 6 -- source-builder/config/gcc-common-1.cfg | 7 +-- source-builder/config/gdb-7-1.cfg | 6 -- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/config/binutils-2-1.cfg b/source-builder/config/binutils-2-1

Re: 4.11 Branching

Hi, I am glad 4.11 will be branched soon. from our side, branching is ok. So: Any open items left? Anything we can do to make the branch happen soon? Any chance to do the branch within this week? We have held back a set of patches which are too new to be useful for the 4.11 branch. On the other s

Re: [PATCH] [RSB] Add support for building Epiphany tools

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 4/05/2015 12:10 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Hesham ALMatary >>> wrote: On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 1/05/2015 7:3